Monthly Archives: April 2019

Extinction Rebellion ‘pause’ climate protests

Climate change activists in London have brought 10 days of  protests to an end with a closing ceremony.

Extinction Rebellion (XR) demonstrators gathered at Speaker’s Corner in Hyde Park on Thursday evening for the event marking an end to the current wave of blockades in the capital.

Skeena Rathor, vision co-ordinator for XR, welcomed the “rebels” to the event and described the crowd of hundreds of people sitting on the grass as “beautiful beings”.

Financial district

She said: “This is our pause ceremony. Welcome to the beginning of our pause.” Ms Rathor invited the eco-protesters to “begin a process of reflection” after the 10-day campaign, adding: “Thank you for what you have done this week.

“It is enormous. It is beyond words. We are here for all of us. And together we are all we need.” Answering a shout from the crowd, she added: “And for all species. Absolutely.”

On their final day, XR members temporarily blockaded the London Stock Exchange by gluing themselves across entrances to the trading hub in the City of London in the morning.

The action came after the group announced on Wednesday it would end blockades at Parliament Square and Marble Arch.

Members of the group targeted London’s financial districts to highlight what they call the business world’s “role in our collective suicide”, on the final day of protests.

Blockade

They were un-attached before being taken away in police vans, with Scotland Yard saying 13 people had been arrested on suspicion of aggravated trespassing. The Exchange said all markets were open as normal.

Elsewhere, six protesters including 83-year-old grandfather Phil Kingston clambered on to the roof of a DLR train at Canary Wharf station in east London, holding signs saying “business as usual = death” and “don’t jail the canaries”.

British Transport Police (BTP) used ropes, ladders and harnesses to remove them before saying six people were arrested on suspicion of obstructing the railway.

In central London, dozens of XR members including drummers and banner-carriers demonstrated outside offices of bankers Goldman Sachs on Fleet Street.

The group moved down the road and blockaded it at intervals, with about a dozen buses seen stuck on either side of the blockade. Police said 13 people were arrested on suspicion of aggravated trespassing in Fleet Street.

Extinction

Protesters later glued themselves to the front of the Treasury in Westminster. The nine protesters, two men and seven women, formed a chain of people preventing others from entering One Horse Guards Road.

An XR spokeswoman said Thursday’s targets were selected because “the financial industry is responsible for funding climate and ecological destruction and we are calling on them, the companies and the institutions that allow this to happen, to tell the truth”.

The spokeswoman added the sign “business as usual = death” was a reference to “the financial sector’s role in our collective suicide”.

XR said the public should expect more action “very soon”. Eco-protesters have urged ministers to declare a climate emergency to avoid a sixth mass extinction of species on Earth.

Emergency

Some 1,130 people have been arrested during the protests which started on April 15, while more than 10,000 police officers have been deployed. The Metropolitan Police said 69 people have been charged, while BTP has charged three people.

The action has seen Waterloo Bridge and Oxford Circus blocked, a “die-in” at the Natural History Museum, and activists gluing themselves to objects.

In a statement on Wednesday announcing the end of its action, XR said: “We would like to thank Londoners for opening their hearts and demonstrating their willingness to act on that truth.

“We know we have disrupted your lives. We do not do this lightly. We only do this because this is an emergency.”

This Author

Catherine Wylie is a reporter with the Press Association.

Extinction Rebellion ‘pause’ climate protests

Climate change activists in London have brought 10 days of  protests to an end with a closing ceremony.

Extinction Rebellion (XR) demonstrators gathered at Speaker’s Corner in Hyde Park on Thursday evening for the event marking an end to the current wave of blockades in the capital.

Skeena Rathor, vision co-ordinator for XR, welcomed the “rebels” to the event and described the crowd of hundreds of people sitting on the grass as “beautiful beings”.

Financial district

She said: “This is our pause ceremony. Welcome to the beginning of our pause.” Ms Rathor invited the eco-protesters to “begin a process of reflection” after the 10-day campaign, adding: “Thank you for what you have done this week.

“It is enormous. It is beyond words. We are here for all of us. And together we are all we need.” Answering a shout from the crowd, she added: “And for all species. Absolutely.”

On their final day, XR members temporarily blockaded the London Stock Exchange by gluing themselves across entrances to the trading hub in the City of London in the morning.

The action came after the group announced on Wednesday it would end blockades at Parliament Square and Marble Arch.

Members of the group targeted London’s financial districts to highlight what they call the business world’s “role in our collective suicide”, on the final day of protests.

Blockade

They were un-attached before being taken away in police vans, with Scotland Yard saying 13 people had been arrested on suspicion of aggravated trespassing. The Exchange said all markets were open as normal.

Elsewhere, six protesters including 83-year-old grandfather Phil Kingston clambered on to the roof of a DLR train at Canary Wharf station in east London, holding signs saying “business as usual = death” and “don’t jail the canaries”.

British Transport Police (BTP) used ropes, ladders and harnesses to remove them before saying six people were arrested on suspicion of obstructing the railway.

In central London, dozens of XR members including drummers and banner-carriers demonstrated outside offices of bankers Goldman Sachs on Fleet Street.

The group moved down the road and blockaded it at intervals, with about a dozen buses seen stuck on either side of the blockade. Police said 13 people were arrested on suspicion of aggravated trespassing in Fleet Street.

Extinction

Protesters later glued themselves to the front of the Treasury in Westminster. The nine protesters, two men and seven women, formed a chain of people preventing others from entering One Horse Guards Road.

An XR spokeswoman said Thursday’s targets were selected because “the financial industry is responsible for funding climate and ecological destruction and we are calling on them, the companies and the institutions that allow this to happen, to tell the truth”.

The spokeswoman added the sign “business as usual = death” was a reference to “the financial sector’s role in our collective suicide”.

XR said the public should expect more action “very soon”. Eco-protesters have urged ministers to declare a climate emergency to avoid a sixth mass extinction of species on Earth.

Emergency

Some 1,130 people have been arrested during the protests which started on April 15, while more than 10,000 police officers have been deployed. The Metropolitan Police said 69 people have been charged, while BTP has charged three people.

The action has seen Waterloo Bridge and Oxford Circus blocked, a “die-in” at the Natural History Museum, and activists gluing themselves to objects.

In a statement on Wednesday announcing the end of its action, XR said: “We would like to thank Londoners for opening their hearts and demonstrating their willingness to act on that truth.

“We know we have disrupted your lives. We do not do this lightly. We only do this because this is an emergency.”

This Author

Catherine Wylie is a reporter with the Press Association.

Extinction Rebellion ‘pause’ climate protests

Climate change activists in London have brought 10 days of  protests to an end with a closing ceremony.

Extinction Rebellion (XR) demonstrators gathered at Speaker’s Corner in Hyde Park on Thursday evening for the event marking an end to the current wave of blockades in the capital.

Skeena Rathor, vision co-ordinator for XR, welcomed the “rebels” to the event and described the crowd of hundreds of people sitting on the grass as “beautiful beings”.

Financial district

She said: “This is our pause ceremony. Welcome to the beginning of our pause.” Ms Rathor invited the eco-protesters to “begin a process of reflection” after the 10-day campaign, adding: “Thank you for what you have done this week.

“It is enormous. It is beyond words. We are here for all of us. And together we are all we need.” Answering a shout from the crowd, she added: “And for all species. Absolutely.”

On their final day, XR members temporarily blockaded the London Stock Exchange by gluing themselves across entrances to the trading hub in the City of London in the morning.

The action came after the group announced on Wednesday it would end blockades at Parliament Square and Marble Arch.

Members of the group targeted London’s financial districts to highlight what they call the business world’s “role in our collective suicide”, on the final day of protests.

Blockade

They were un-attached before being taken away in police vans, with Scotland Yard saying 13 people had been arrested on suspicion of aggravated trespassing. The Exchange said all markets were open as normal.

Elsewhere, six protesters including 83-year-old grandfather Phil Kingston clambered on to the roof of a DLR train at Canary Wharf station in east London, holding signs saying “business as usual = death” and “don’t jail the canaries”.

British Transport Police (BTP) used ropes, ladders and harnesses to remove them before saying six people were arrested on suspicion of obstructing the railway.

In central London, dozens of XR members including drummers and banner-carriers demonstrated outside offices of bankers Goldman Sachs on Fleet Street.

The group moved down the road and blockaded it at intervals, with about a dozen buses seen stuck on either side of the blockade. Police said 13 people were arrested on suspicion of aggravated trespassing in Fleet Street.

Extinction

Protesters later glued themselves to the front of the Treasury in Westminster. The nine protesters, two men and seven women, formed a chain of people preventing others from entering One Horse Guards Road.

An XR spokeswoman said Thursday’s targets were selected because “the financial industry is responsible for funding climate and ecological destruction and we are calling on them, the companies and the institutions that allow this to happen, to tell the truth”.

The spokeswoman added the sign “business as usual = death” was a reference to “the financial sector’s role in our collective suicide”.

XR said the public should expect more action “very soon”. Eco-protesters have urged ministers to declare a climate emergency to avoid a sixth mass extinction of species on Earth.

Emergency

Some 1,130 people have been arrested during the protests which started on April 15, while more than 10,000 police officers have been deployed. The Metropolitan Police said 69 people have been charged, while BTP has charged three people.

The action has seen Waterloo Bridge and Oxford Circus blocked, a “die-in” at the Natural History Museum, and activists gluing themselves to objects.

In a statement on Wednesday announcing the end of its action, XR said: “We would like to thank Londoners for opening their hearts and demonstrating their willingness to act on that truth.

“We know we have disrupted your lives. We do not do this lightly. We only do this because this is an emergency.”

This Author

Catherine Wylie is a reporter with the Press Association.

Extinction Rebellion ‘pause’ climate protests

Climate change activists in London have brought 10 days of  protests to an end with a closing ceremony.

Extinction Rebellion (XR) demonstrators gathered at Speaker’s Corner in Hyde Park on Thursday evening for the event marking an end to the current wave of blockades in the capital.

Skeena Rathor, vision co-ordinator for XR, welcomed the “rebels” to the event and described the crowd of hundreds of people sitting on the grass as “beautiful beings”.

Financial district

She said: “This is our pause ceremony. Welcome to the beginning of our pause.” Ms Rathor invited the eco-protesters to “begin a process of reflection” after the 10-day campaign, adding: “Thank you for what you have done this week.

“It is enormous. It is beyond words. We are here for all of us. And together we are all we need.” Answering a shout from the crowd, she added: “And for all species. Absolutely.”

On their final day, XR members temporarily blockaded the London Stock Exchange by gluing themselves across entrances to the trading hub in the City of London in the morning.

The action came after the group announced on Wednesday it would end blockades at Parliament Square and Marble Arch.

Members of the group targeted London’s financial districts to highlight what they call the business world’s “role in our collective suicide”, on the final day of protests.

Blockade

They were un-attached before being taken away in police vans, with Scotland Yard saying 13 people had been arrested on suspicion of aggravated trespassing. The Exchange said all markets were open as normal.

Elsewhere, six protesters including 83-year-old grandfather Phil Kingston clambered on to the roof of a DLR train at Canary Wharf station in east London, holding signs saying “business as usual = death” and “don’t jail the canaries”.

British Transport Police (BTP) used ropes, ladders and harnesses to remove them before saying six people were arrested on suspicion of obstructing the railway.

In central London, dozens of XR members including drummers and banner-carriers demonstrated outside offices of bankers Goldman Sachs on Fleet Street.

The group moved down the road and blockaded it at intervals, with about a dozen buses seen stuck on either side of the blockade. Police said 13 people were arrested on suspicion of aggravated trespassing in Fleet Street.

Extinction

Protesters later glued themselves to the front of the Treasury in Westminster. The nine protesters, two men and seven women, formed a chain of people preventing others from entering One Horse Guards Road.

An XR spokeswoman said Thursday’s targets were selected because “the financial industry is responsible for funding climate and ecological destruction and we are calling on them, the companies and the institutions that allow this to happen, to tell the truth”.

The spokeswoman added the sign “business as usual = death” was a reference to “the financial sector’s role in our collective suicide”.

XR said the public should expect more action “very soon”. Eco-protesters have urged ministers to declare a climate emergency to avoid a sixth mass extinction of species on Earth.

Emergency

Some 1,130 people have been arrested during the protests which started on April 15, while more than 10,000 police officers have been deployed. The Metropolitan Police said 69 people have been charged, while BTP has charged three people.

The action has seen Waterloo Bridge and Oxford Circus blocked, a “die-in” at the Natural History Museum, and activists gluing themselves to objects.

In a statement on Wednesday announcing the end of its action, XR said: “We would like to thank Londoners for opening their hearts and demonstrating their willingness to act on that truth.

“We know we have disrupted your lives. We do not do this lightly. We only do this because this is an emergency.”

This Author

Catherine Wylie is a reporter with the Press Association.

Fake leadership and corporate responsibility

Lately I’ve been thinking a lot about the state of corporate sustainability and how it’s not delivering on the promise of a sustainable business model.

In 2018 CO2 emissions hit their highest level in recent history, plastic pollution continues to get worse and is now in our food chain, biodiversity loss is accelerating, and at no time has the rate of species loss been greater. This is all happening under our watch.

The positive inputs from Corporate Sustainability, CSR, Conscious Capitalism, Social Innovation and Impact Investing look very promising but the outputs are increasingly disturbing.

Ocean Plastics Charter

This got me thinking about the messaging that we’ve been hearing over the past few years from both governments and corporations and how their promises are also not being fulfilled. Which brought me to the idea of “fake leadership”.

You know, the type of leadership on an important issue that has no teeth and goes nowhere while every day our planet sinks further into an irreversible collapse. Too dramatic? Have a look at any number of scientific reports that will tell you quite clearly what’s coming if we don’t turn things around.

A brilliant example of fake leadership is the G7 Ocean Plastics Charter that was signed in Canada in 2018. All the main polluters, including Walmart, Unilever, Coca Cola and Nestle, “pledged” to help reduce plastic pollution by endorsing the new Charter. Let’s take a closer look.

First, the word pledge is an interesting choice to hear from a corporation, “a solemn promise or agreement to do or refrain from doing something”.

Second, the agreement was non-binding, meaning that it was a document that laid out the goals but no obligation to fulfill the terms.

Hollow pledge

Third, while the goals were ambitious, they were vague: “making all plastics recyclable by 2030, reducing single-use plastics, promoting the use of recycled plastic, pledging to build out recycling infrastructure and innovate around more sustainable technologies.”

Fourth, this is not the first kick at the can for world leaders addressing plastic pollution.

In 2015, the G7 in Germany launched an action plan to combat marine litter, which was then reaffirmed in 2016 in Japan and further discussed in 2017 in Italy. Even back in 1995, more than a hundred governments committed to protecting the marine environment from the impact of land-based activities.

And yet here we are, in 2019, with a plastic island in the Pacific Ocean twice the size of Texas and plastic particulates in our drinking water and food chain.

Despite its tepid terms, and a history of very little coming of these types of agreements, both the United States and Japan still found it too far reaching to sign the G7 Ocean Plastic Charter. Can this whole charade be described as anything other than fake leadership? An ineffective and hollow “pledge” that acknowledges, once again, that we have a problem, with no real pathway to find solutions. 

Binding targets

Greenpeace International Executive Director, Jennifer Morgan said in a statement: “While the leadership to outline a common blueprint is good news, voluntary charters focused on recycling and repurposing will not solve the problem at the source.

“It’s time for the world’s largest economies to recognise that we cannot simply recycle our way out of this problem while we keep churning out so much throwaway plastic in the first place.

“Governments must move beyond voluntary agreements to legislate binding reduction targets and bans on single-use plastics, invest in new and reuse delivery models for products, and hold corporations accountable for the problem they have created.”

The Plastic Charter was portrayed by the corporate friendly media as a ground breaking initiative and it continues to be plugged in that way, at least by Canada’s Justin Trudeau.

Recently at a climate rally in Toronto, curiously timed during a Liberal Party scandal, he reiterated his pride in his government’s great work in dealing with plastic pollution and climate change, using the G7 Ocean Plastic Charter to illustrate his point.

State of complacency

This is not leadership! A vague and non-binding Ocean Plastics Charter, that makes no mention of either eliminating single use plastics or of holding corporations accountable for the problem they created in the first place. How is this any different than a doctor who tells a lung cancer patient to feel free to keep smoking while trying different therapies to stop the disease?

I suppose if the doctor was controlled or compensated by the cigarette industry, while ethically despicable, at least you could understand his/her motivations. Is that what’s happening here between the plastics industry and our politicians?

It sure seems like that’s the case. Without disturbing the underlying system which greatly enriches a few at the expense of everyone else, politicians offer, at best, weak legislation that does nothing to address the source of the plastic toxins that are destroying our ecosystem.

Unfortunately most people are overextended and only glance quickly at the corporate friendly headlines – and that’s exactly what politicians and corporations count on.

Show “fake leadership” with a few symbolic gestures and the public will feel good knowing that someone is on the job addressing their concerns. But in many ways these promises are more insidious than doing nothing. When big corporations and governments say that they are going to respond to a crisis, it lulls us into a state of complacency.

Dysfunctional democracy 

Complacency is dangerous because rather than standing up and voicing our concerns with what appears to be a serious lack of engagement, we are quiet, believing that someone else is  taking care of the problem. 

For the better part of the last 15 years, a hopeful public has been pacified with promises, while the corporate sustainability movement continues to track in a direction that suppresses meaningful regulations, in favour of hope that somehow a market based solution will emerge.

For those who see the world through a more cynical lens, it almost seems as if those in control of the narrative, the super elites, are not just steering change in a particular direction but rather, they are disrupting change in a way that can best be described as stonewalling to maintain the status quo.

We’ve tried to move forward with fake leadership but clearly it’s not working. Our politicians act like puppets for the real leaders; Billionaires, Corporate Elites, Fossil Fuel Companies and Wall Street.

Without change, our democracy will continue to be dysfunctional and wealth will continue to concentrate.

Intergenerational theft

Our current path is leading directly to the intersection of climate breakdown and inequality inspired fury. People are no longer willing to sit back and watch as the rigged system provides crumbs for the masses while the elite accumulate the vast majority of income and wealth while simultaneously destroying the environment.

Even children have become disgusted as they watch this horror show unfold. Just last week over a million children from around the world participated in a climate strike, hoping to let politicians know that they won’t accept the future that’s being offered.

The capitalist system is behaving like a cancerous tumour that is stealing life from the future to satisfy its ravenous needs, for a few, in the present.

According to author and environmental activist, George Monbiot, in a recent article: “The economy is an environmental pyramid scheme, dumping its liabilities on the young and the unborn. Its current growth depends on intergenerational theft.”

Real change is coming and – contrary to the neoliberal, crony capitalism, billionaire “we broke it but we’re the best ones to fix it” mantra – it won’t be a market based win-win.

Empty promises 

Those who are profiting the most from a rigged system that creates massive inequality and ecosystem destruction, namely Billionaires, Corporate Elites, Fossil Fuel Companies and Wall Street, will need to accept that one way or another, either voluntarily or by force, they will need to relinquish some of their power. Hopefully they will accept a little less through regulation but there is another way.

People have shown that they are willing to hire any politician who can make the case that they will deliver us back to a better time when average citizens had more. The problem is that those are usually empty promises, sold to us by distracting us and blaming the weak, and often carried out forcefully using violence. 

The path forward is quite clear but it requires the ability of those in power to see what they’ve created through a new lens of fairness. Not fairness for a few hungry folks here and there BUT systemic fairness that will put the big challenges of our time back where they belong, in the hands of our democratic system and our elected leaders. 

The fight for corporate sustainability is nothing more than a proxy fight for corporate power that has run amok.  As Nick Hanauer said in his 2014 article, the pitchforks are coming for us plutocrats.

The time for real leadership has arrived and you can be sure that the person who is best suited for the job won’t be a billionaire who was part of the “team” that created the dysfunction in the first place.

This Author 

Brad Zarnett is a sustainability strategist, a blogger and speaker and the Founder of the Toronto Sustainability Speaker Series (TSSS). You can follow Brad on twitter at @bradzarnett or on LinkedIn.

This article was first published by the Toronto Sustainability Speaker Series

The green deserts of Nilgiris

Annavi worked on a tea plantation as a young man. Now he is helping clear it in the name of ecological restoration, together with his daughter Annalakshmi.

The hard-working duo have been clearing the 15 acre plot of land since a local NGO called EBR bought the area five years ago. They stop for a short break to talk to us, but then swiftly return to their task at hand. 

Annavi tears off a tea shrub after laboriously decapitating the colonial plant that covers the hills of Nilgiris in the state of Tamil Nadu, in the southern parts of India: “The white guy put it here,” he says. The roots are firmly planted in the hard soil, an illustrious symbol of the history of the area. He examines the root, but leaves it be

He says: “This one has been here more than 60-70 years”. He throws it in a pile together with the other remains of a tea-plantation.

Teashrub carcasses

Annalakshmi grabs a small saw and starts working her way through the thick branches of another shrub while her father watches over and gives advice.

He bends down to inspect the labor and picks up a tiny axe with which he finishes the job. Annalakshmi stands by, drying the sweat off her face.

The pair are both thin, but their colorful clothes hide impressive strength and tenacity. A few feet away lies a huge pile of teashrub carcasses. The steep hill looks barren after it has been stripped of its near century old garment. 

Vasanth Bosco, a ‘ocal restoration activist said: “The shrubs are dried up and used as compost for the nursery”. He points down the hill towards a fenced off little garden where small trees are pruning amidst other native greenery.

Annavi takes the lead and strides down to show us the fruits of their work. Here some remnants of the once luscious Nilgiris are allowed to grow strong in order to be re-planted onto the land that has been taken back from the arms of exotic and commercial cash-crops.

Impatience 

Annavi opens the gate to the small nursery and says  that they have 30 species here.

Amidst a variety of long grass bending in the wind and small plants barely visible to the eye, there are also impressive flowers. Vasanth points to a particularly beautiful one: “That one is called impatiens”, he says softly.

Impatience. That seems like a fitting word to describe the sense of urgency and irritation amongst concerned locals living in one of the biodiversity hotspots of the world.

Impatience – but also frustration over the fate of the mesmerizing landscape that has slowly started to turn into a green desert.  

Vasanth lamented: “In an ecosystem like this, which is designed to store water, a tea-estate completely turns it upside down. The soil characteristics change and it ends up needing more and more water to support the tea plants.

“Natural flora supports bees and insects, but tea plants don’t. So it looks green, but it is actually a desert.”

Invasive plants

As a tourist it is easy to be dazzled by the green hills of the Blue Mountains, as Nilgiris is popularly called. The slopes are covered by lush tea shrubs, where local women equipped with white cotton bags collect the precious green leaves that then are shipped off to thirsty tea-drinking nations.

The tea is planted in balconies along the hillside and make the landscape resemble James Hilton’s fictional paradise Shangri-la, with its blue, foggy mountains serving as a dreamy backdrop.

But the illusion is quickly shattered sitting in a car with a local conservationist. On our drive up to the restored plantation, Vasanth is quick to point out what is native and what is not. And it is not the most uplifting car game. 

“All of these are eucalyptus”, he says and points towards the trees towering along the winding road. He continues his ominous description of the landscape we pass by:  “All the vegetation you see here? Nothing of it is native, it is grass from Africa and trees from Australia.”

Capitalism and exoticism

I ask him how come the invasive plants have become so overpowering. He has a simple answer: “In a local setting, plants will control other plants, they live in a community.

“But if you bring in a new plant from somewhere else, it has no restrictions. That is how they become invasive. They are like children. They don’t have a family to control them.”

The Nilgiris has one of the highest densities of invasive species in the world. Most of it was brought with the British in various forms when they first settled the area in the early nineteenth century: “A lot of it was ornamental plants. They felt homesick and wanted Nilgiris to look more like home.”

And then the tea-market boomed. A lot of the local and indigenous crops were slowly but steadily replaced with tea monocultures. The Nilgiris is home to a large population of indigenous people, of whom many turned away from local livelihoods to take on wage-labor at one of the hundreds sprawling estates.

And so a new era had begun for the ecologically sensitive area. An era of capitalism and exoticism.

Climate breakdown

The region is now heavily touristic and lands are being cleared for resorts, holiday homes and expensive villas.

Vasanth says that “Nilgiris is actually one region where the local population is reducing”. 

The steep hillsides with the accompanying stunning scenery are scattered with construction work: “The ultra-rich are growing and they choose places with views. But that causes landslides and disturbance of the hydrology.

“And the hills are becoming more attractive not just for its scenery, but also because of the increasing heat. Climate change forces people up the hills. It is too warm in the plains.”

The changing landscapes are having a big impact on the traditional livelihoods of the indigenous tribes in the area.

Sustainable tribe

The Todas tribe claimed to be “one of the most sustainable” communities in the world. They are a people dependent on the fruits of the forest and the plants of the Nilgiris for both medicinal and ritual purposes.

Tarun Chabra, a Toda specialist and also the man who started EBR in 2003, said: “In the towns where the Todas used to live there used to be so many plants native to the Nilgiris. Now they are pretty much wiped out”.

Chabra says that there are at least 100 plant species needed for the different rites of passages carried out under a Toda-lifetime.

“With those their culture can continue. They cannot substitute them. So every year they have to go searching for these pockets where to find them.”

But the Todas are not the only one finding their lives, and culture, limited by the veining of the flora. All indigenous tribes rely heavily on a nature-connected existence. In some areas the lack of specific species is becoming life threatening.

Nature connection

Janakiamma, a Kurumba elder who we meet deep in the forest a two-hour drive away, said: “Last week my grandson got a fever. We knew of a plant that would help. You usually find it on the riverside, but now we had to go search for it”.

She is sitting by the fire, roasting coffee beans, in her home village of Vellaricombai, a demanding six kilometer walk through lush woods and spectacular scenery.

There is no way to reach here by car so Janakiamma treks this path every day to tend to her errands. Accompanying her by the fire, watching the sun setting over the mountains with its last rays of suns sprawling over her neat little house, I understand why she does not feel like moving away. It is nothing short of paradise.

Janakiamma is a traditional healer and storyteller and passes down her knowledge to her daughters whom she takes out in the forest regularly to teach them the secrets of nature. But her work is getting more difficult as the landscape around her changes.

“There are fewer plants than there were in the old days, because of climate change. When you get more rain, then you have landslides that cover all the plants.”

A microcosm 

Back at the tea-plantation, Vasanth’s tone changes and becomes almost excited as he explains the pressures of both invasive species, land-use, pollution and climate breakdown on this particularly sensitive region.

Vasanth is writing a book called The Voice of a Sentient Highland, which describes the delicate landscape and its pressures placed upon it over the last nine years.

He says: “The Nilgiris is like a microcosm of Earth. It has a huge amount of biodiversity and almost every kind of pressure that can effect ecology packed into this landscape.

“Here are vital lessons to learn for the rest of the world”, says the young environmentalist who has been writing a book, called “The voice of a sentient highland”.

One of those lessons is the diligent perseverance of the natural flora. Despite decades of oppression and marginalization – it still holds its ground.

Indigenous marginalisation 

Vasanth says sincerely: “There is another level of decline now that even these natural capacities cannot address. The ecology here with its exceptional qualities, seems to be communicating to us that we have to take notice of this and act. The world needs to listen to this.”

So far their fight has not been visible. As with the many indigenous people pushed to the fringes of society, both culturally and geographically, so do native plant species find their foothold on the margins of nature: “You find them towards the edges of the hills. In steep and harsh conditions. Where people and invasive don’t want to go.”

Spaces on the edge, like the ones Annavi and Annalakshmi are working on, need to be restored to help the natives breathe, regain their footing – and speak up.

“The idea is to try and restore the whole valley”, Vasanth says and looks around at the majestic scenery surrounding us. 

Annavi closes the gate behind us and returns up the hill where his daughter relentlessly tugs at the massive bushes.

Defiant land 

It might not seem much. This little piece of defiant land, flanked by even bigger, and still running, tea-estates on either side.

Small plants that you can barely see and trees just about to root as the land is cleared to become home for native grass once again. 

But maybe, just maybe, it is a place for the impatient flowers of Nilgiris to become a little less impatient. And a little more loud.

Author

Heidi Hendersson is a Finnish environmental journalist. She likes to write about minimalism, DIY, community-building and holistic remedies to planetary crisis. This story came about as Heidi was doing an internship with a local environmental organisation, Keystone Foundation, in the area. 

Is telecommuting good for the environment?

The International Workplace Group’s Global Workspace Survey was published last month and its findings are as relevant to the environment as they are to workplace dynamics and psychology. 

The survey questioned over 15,000 business people from across 80 nations. Over half reported that their employees work outside of their main office headquarters at least twice a week. 

Anyone doing any type of work from a computer can now work remotely, as technology becomes more portable and production is digitised. While telecommuting serves to benefit the planet, how can we organise our communities and employment to assist those telecommuting who lack certain support and social structures?

Carbon footprint

Of those surveyed, the number of businesses that have work-flex friendly policies was quite small compared to the sample size, which suggests that businesses are slow to adopt a telecommuting policy.

Ravi Gajendran from the Florida International University conducted research on telecommuting and found that working from home contributes to improved performance for employees in complex jobs, which allows them to focus on their work while benefitting from fewer interruptions common in an office setting. 

In Ottawa, Canada, it is widely known that telecommuting is key to reducing the capital’s ecological footprint while also improving people’s health, according to a study by Courtney Howard, Caren Rose, and Trevor Hancock published in the Lancet medical journal.  

This report recommends telecommuting for cutting greenhouse gas emissions from transportation. The report also cited another Canadian study, “Telecommuting and sustainable travel,” which demonstrates that working from homedecreases overall travel time by 14 minutes and increases non-motorised travel by 77 percent. 

Approximately 68 percent of commuters get to work in a private vehicle which is fewer than any other major city in the country.

Work productivity

Another article, “The Positive Environmental Impact of Remote Work,” highlights various environmental gains due to telecommuters which range from the petrol savings of over $20 million internationally, reduced greenhouse gas emissions (equal to 54 million tons yearly), decreased traffic, improved air quality, reduced carbon footprints, and vast energy savings. 

According to the 2015 PGI Global Telework Survey, approximately 79 percent of workers work from home at home at least one day per week. 

With technology that allows at-home-workers and employers to communicate outside the office through online software, new technology facilitates an ecological working environment while also improved work productivity.

So why are more businesses not stepping up to the telecommuting model? 

The benefits are multiple and well-substantiated today: reduced traffic impact, improved air quality, energy savings, lower overhead for companies, smaller carbon footprint, and less impact on transportation infrastructure. What’s not to like? 

Flexible working 

Certainly, cities like San Antonio, Texas are recognising the importance of telecommuting in relation to its mandate of diminishing the city’s ozone levels. 

Yet, cities like London which have made great strides to bring in bicycle lanes and the Cycle Superhighway, cyclists are still having to be careful of where they ride in order to avoid the high levels of pollution

Earlier this year, the Philippines signed into law the Telecommuting Act (Republic Act 11165 ) for “knowledge workers,” whereby an employer in the private sector may offer a telecommuting option to its employees either on a voluntary basis or as a result of collective bargaining. 

In a country where hundreds of thousands of Filipinos work primarily from their homes employed in the Business Process Outsourcing (BPO) sector as call centre agents, this law enables people to earn a living while also not having to waste valuable resources to travel great distances.

In the UK since 2002, flexible working has enabled any employee with children under the age of 6 to request a flexible working arrangement. But the British government has not gone as far as the Philippines in making this move towards telecommuting. 

Local possibilities 

In the US, the number of telecommuters in 2015 had more than doubled from 2005 with a growth rate approximately 10 times greater than what the traditional workforce registered during the same period according to a 2017 report by FlexJobs

The absence of laws supporting telecommuting begs the question as to why western nations are lagging behind.

Let’s not pretend that telecommuting is a simply policy shift where we can all work from our pyjamas in complete bliss. These are many downsides to telecommuting: social isolation and fragmentation of the social network of the workplace; the psychological effects of one’s home also being a work space; insecure or shared housing for which this arrangement can lead to the eventual dissolution of one’s housing; and overworking. 

Another factor often ignored by studies, is that or women specifically are caught in the gendered double-bind where they are expected to perform both professional and domestic labour and for whom the office space can often be a refuge from the burdens of the domestic.  

Lastly, for telecommuters whose employers are not covering overhead costs, the economic side of this equation is also a factor.

Viable Solutions

But there are remedies to these issues. Just as freelancers solved many of these same problems with shared local office space, so too can telecommuters take up this model or work from a local café, library or park. 

Telework hubsare also a viable solution for many where local office space is provided at a fraction of the costs that corporations are paying for prime real estate in major urban centres while allowing workers have a healthy division between work and home.

Where co-working office space took off in cities like New York in the late 1990s, today we are seeing a revival of this model for telecommuters which is also paradoxically saving an architecturaland urban planning dilemma in the US: the dying shopping mall.

Having office space within walking or cycling distance of home, the employee can find a healthy work environment with all the benefits of social interactions, high speed Internet, and support staff—coffee and water cooler to boot—without having to spend two hours plus a day commuting through toxic emissions.

Specific to the challenges women face, some telecommuting offer on-site childcare, but this is rare. Even Japan has been attempting to tackle this issue by encouraging parents working from home to wearbadgesso that their children will know that they are working. Clearly, this suggestion was made by someone who does nothave children. 

In order to solve the problem of women being saddled with more work and domestic pressure, we need telecommuting solutions in which women are not bound to the home and where parents can access some of the more recent co-working and nursery centres such as London’s Third Doorand Second Home. All are viable solutions and would still provide savings for the employer. 

Climate change 

The reality of what is happening to our planet is even harsher than even I imagined — and I write on this subject regularly.  

In watching Our Planet with my small children, I realised quite early on that despite the beautiful images of blue whales, elephant seals and polar bears, that this was a film of a dystopia entirely caused by humans. 

What was to be a feel-good series, quickly turned into my having to explain why seals no longer have the ability to make ice dens to protect their young from polar bears and why walruses are now forced to climb up a dangerous cliff from which hundreds fall to their deaths. 

The reality of climate change is here and our communities must act now or share dire repercussions with the animals so beautifully and horrifically captured in this series.

Telecommuting is one viable way for us to resituate and restructure habitual patterns in order to reduce our carbon footprint, share resources and build resilience. 

This Author 

Julian Vigo is an independent scholar, filmmaker and activist who specialises in anthropology, technology, and political philosophy. Her latest book is Earthquake in Haiti: The Pornography of Poverty and the Politics of Development (2015). You can follow her on Twitter at @lubelluledotcom.

Extinction Rebellion targets seat of capitalism

Climate change activists plan to cause rush hour disruption in London’s financial district before they bring an end to days of protests in the centre of the city.

Demonstrators said they will swarm into the Square Mile on Thursday to cause roadblocks, targeting big business and banking. The action reflected concerns about the financial sector voiced by George Monbiot who argues today that citizens need to ‘overthrow capitalism‘ to prevent climate breakdown. 

Extinction Rebellion (XR) said its action in the City of London is likely to last a few hours, and comes on the day it is due to end blockades at Parliament Square and Marble Arch.

Ecological destruction

Members of Extinction Rebellion have glued themselves to the London Stock Exchange as part of the protests against climate change. Two men and five women glued themselves to a wall and to each other. They wore LED signs reading: “Climate emergency”, “Tell the truth” and “You can’t eat money”.

A spokeswoman for the group said: “There’s a public event which is what we are calling swarming, where at different locations in the City people will swarm into the roads and block the roads.”

She said the area is being targeted because “the financial industry is responsible for funding climate and ecological destruction and we are calling on them, the companies and the institutions that allow this to happen, to tell the truth. And we’re asking the Government to take action to address the climate emergency.”

Eco-protesters have been urging the Government to declare a climate emergency to avoid what it calls the “sixth mass extinction” of species on Earth.

In a statement announcing the end of their action XR said: “We would like to thank Londoners for opening their hearts and demonstrating their willingness to act on that truth.

Closing ceremony

“We know we have disrupted your lives. We do not do this lightly. We only do this because this is an emergency. Around the planet, a long-awaited and much-needed conversation has begun.

“People have taken to the streets and raised the alarm in more than 80 cities in 33 countries. People are talking about the climate and ecological emergency in ways that we never imagined.”

The group added: “It is now time to go back into our communities, whether in London, around the UK or internationally.”

XR also said to expect more actions “very soon”, adding there will be a “closing ceremony” at Speakers’ Corner in Hyde Park on Thursday at 5pm.

More than 1,000 people have been arrested during XR protests which started on April 15, while more than 10,000 police officers have been deployed.

Arrests

As of Wednesday evening, Scotland Yard had charged 69 people in connection with the protests.

They were charged with offences including breach of Section 14 Notice of the Public Order Act 1986, obstructing a highway and obstructing police.

Three others have been charged by British Transport Police and have appeared in court. As of 4pm on Wednesday, a further 23 arrests were made, bringing the total arrest figure to 1,088, Scotland Yard said.

Police said 22 arrests were made in Marble Arch on suspicion of breaching a Section 14 Notice of the Public Order Act 1986, and one further arrest was made in Parliament Square on suspicion of possession of a bladed article. Of those arrested, 12 are women and 11 are men and they are aged between 19 and 70.

Police said conditions imposed in the Marble Arch area have been extended for a further three days, meaning that people who wish to continue protesting must assemble in a specific area.

Extinction Rebellion’s key demands are:

  1. Government must tell the truth by declaring a climate and ecological emergency, working with other institutions to communicate the urgency for change.
  2. Government must act now to halt biodiversity loss and reduce greenhouse gas emissions to net zero by 2025.
  3. Government must create and be led by the decisions of a Citizens’ Assembly on climate and ecological justice.

 

This Author

Brendan Montague is editor of The Ecologist. This article includes copy and an image provided by the Press Association.

A race against time

In 2020 the eyes of the world will fall on Tokyo, where the next Olympic games will take place.

In December 2022 Qatar will become the first Arab state to host the FIFA World Cup, followed by the Beijing Winter Olympics in the February of that year.

What effects will these major sporting events have on the planet?

Environmental footprint

It is no wonder that prestigious events are so sought after, considering the enticement of riches, tourism and regeneration of their communities. However, these major events are causing damage which may be slipping under the radar.

The environmental issues that arise with these events include everything from building new stadiums, new hotels and in some cases new cities.

When Qatar controversially won their World Cup bid in 2010, the final was (and still is) scheduled to take place in the Lusail Iconic Stadium, a stadium which is yet to be built, in a city (Lusail), which is yet to be finished.

In preparation for the 2014 World Cup, Brazil spent $300million building the 44,000 capacity Arena de Amazônia in the city of Manaus. This stadium was also used in the 2016 Olympic Games. Now it lies virtually abandoned.

The carbon emissions that come with building new stadiums also is a substantial issue. Large stadiums come with a large environmental footprint, food waste and the energy needed to power the stadia are just two things that have a negative effect on the planet and with the world needing to reduce its emissions this is worrying.

Global events

The negative effects of travelling to these events is also a significant factor in increasing the damage to our planet. Devoted spectators clock up thousands of air miles in their quest to see sporting history made and to be able to boast “I was there.”

It won’t be an easy task to change this trend. Other sports are leaving their traditional homes in order to travel the world – in an increasing variety of events.

The Tennis ATP tour schedules prestigious matches all around the globe and American Football is also starting to follow suit with games being held in London every season. Indeed, Tottenham Hotspur’s new stadium has been designed in the knowledge they will be hosting such games.

Matt Chilton is a sports journalist who regularly covers global events. He’s attended 13 Olympic Games (both summer and winter) and has been a regular for the BBC as a commentator for Wimbledon. He thinks that it’s a tricky situation to be in: “I think that something needs to change when it comes to major tournaments.

“I think that tennis is very guilty sport. The ATP tour begins in Australia in January and concludes in London in November with only a break really in December but there are still exhibitions in Asia that month.”

Policy shift

Chilton continued: “The amount of air miles that the players cover is ridiculous. But how can you stop that when every country wants to hold a tournament? 

Do you say we’re only going to play Tennis events in Europe, and everybody can travel by train? But then what about the US open, the Australian open and all the rest? What can we do about that?

“It would take a massive shift in policy to try and reduce their carbon footprint. The Alpine Ski Racing programme is another.

“It starts in Austria in October, then it moves to North America in November and then it comes back to Europe for January and quite often it will head to Asia for maybe a weekend, before returning to Europe.

“That strikes me as being irresponsible when Europe has enough mountains, ski resorts, ski runs and snow for it all to be held here. But I think commercial considerations are obviously winning out with that.”

Sense of urgency

What then can these events do to change for the better? Jamie Peters, an environmental campaigner for Friends of the Earth says that sporting organisations need to be doing all they can to move away from a disposable ethos and buck the trend to ensure change.

Peters said: “If you’re organising the Olympics or European championships you must be taking all the steps you can to make them cleaner because there is going to be a spotlight on them.

“People aren’t stupid. When they see things like a World Cup being held in the desert but taking place in air-conditioned stadiums, they know that it’s nonsense. I’m obviously referring to the Qatar world cup.

“But I think it works two ways. These big institutions like FIFA and UEFA are going to be pressured from the grassroots up. People will be expecting them to do more.

“Some of these organisations historically have only ever acted when they’ve been forced to act, and I think we’re going to be seeing society demand big changes.

“All of these big sporting events will have to move away from this disposable culture that’s been created within the last generation and they’re going to have to do it really quickly. The onus will be on them to show a sense of urgency.”

Climate action 

Change is starting to happen. Numerous organisations have signed up to the Sports for Climate Action Framework in a concerted bid to raise awareness and to encourage action to meet the goals of the Paris agreement.

The International Olympic Committee, FIFA and Tokyo 2020 Summer Olympics have all signed up, and the French Tennis Federation – Roland Garros – have also committed to tackling the problem.

The starting gun has been fired but it’s a race against time.

This Author 

Andrew Gate is a final-year Sports Journalism student at Staffordshire University and freelance journalist. He has recently branched out and written a number of pieces on the effects of climate change and sustainability in sport. Twitter: @GateAndrew