Tag Archives: park

DRC Congo wants to develop Virunga’s oil Updated for 2026





The Democratic Republic of Congo’s prime minister has said that his government wants to find a way to explore for oil in the Virunga national park, a UNESCO World Heritage Site, and will engage in negotiations with the UN body to “explore judiciously”.

Virunga, Africa’s oldest and most biodiverse park, has been on the list of ‘World Heritage in danger’ since 1994, as two decades of armed conflict and intense poaching by militias has taken its toll on the park’s ecosystem.

In 2007, the Congolese ministry of hydrocarbons awarded two oil concessions straddling Virunga’s boundaries to the French major Total, as well as Soco International, a British oil company registered on the London Stock Exchange.

While Total quickly agreed to never explore within the current limits of the park – even in the event of a boundaries change – Soco has carried out exploratory activities in Virunga, concluding a seismic study in July 2014.

The company said it will hand over the results of the seismic survey to the Congolese government in coming months. It is based on these results that the DRC will decide whether to explore further.

Oil exploration ‘incompatible’ with World Heritage designation

Famous for its mountain gorillas, among the last ones on the planet, Virunga is home to dozens of endangered species, mainly found in and around Lake Edward, the area where Soco has been exploring.

According to the UNESCO convention, the exploration and exploitation of oil is incompatible with the World Heritage Site status. To allow drilling for oil wells legally, the government will have to declassify parts of the park, or Virunga as a whole.

“It would not be a minor modification of the park limits. It would be a major modification that would impair the universal value of the park”, said Leila Maziz, the coordinator for the Congo Basin projects at UNESCO. She added that UNESCO has not received an official request from the Congolese government at this stage.

In its annual report issued last week, Soco stated that it will not be part of the discussions between the UN body and the government. However, prime minister Augustin Matata Ponyo told the BBC that “Soco had brought the issue of the boundary to the government’s attention.”

Under international pressure following a global campaign by WWF and the documentary Virunga, Soco issued a statement that it would not seek to explore further in the park “unless Unesco and the DRC government agree that such activities are not incompatible with its world heritage status.”

Following that statement in June 2014, Soco’s deputy chief executive Roger Cagle told the Times that, nevertheless, DRC could apply for a boundary change.

An ‘alarming’ development

In an official letter seen by the Guardian, Matata Ponyo wrote that his government has been considering boundary change since July 2014, following the UNESCO summit.

“It is alarming that the Congolese prime minister says that Soco has raised the issue of Virunga’s boundary with the government and that the government appears to be moving towards declassifying some of the park”, Dyer said.

A spokeswoman for Soco said: “Soco has publicly stated that it has not and will not lobby the DRC government to redraw the boundaries of the Virunga national park.”

As part of its report, Soco also announced that it has hired the legal firm Clifford Chance to carry out an independent investigation into the allegations brought forward by the documentary ‘Virunga’, as well as Human Rights Watch and Global Witness.

In February, the Church of England threatened to sell its £3m share in Soco, over concerns relating to the company’s behaviour in DRC.

 


 

This article was originally published by the Guardian and is republished here by kind permission via the Guardian Environment Network.

 




391376

DRC Congo wants to develop Virunga’s oil Updated for 2026





The Democratic Republic of Congo’s prime minister has said that his government wants to find a way to explore for oil in the Virunga national park, a UNESCO World Heritage Site, and will engage in negotiations with the UN body to “explore judiciously”.

Virunga, Africa’s oldest and most biodiverse park, has been on the list of ‘World Heritage in danger’ since 1994, as two decades of armed conflict and intense poaching by militias has taken its toll on the park’s ecosystem.

In 2007, the Congolese ministry of hydrocarbons awarded two oil concessions straddling Virunga’s boundaries to the French major Total, as well as Soco International, a British oil company registered on the London Stock Exchange.

While Total quickly agreed to never explore within the current limits of the park – even in the event of a boundaries change – Soco has carried out exploratory activities in Virunga, concluding a seismic study in July 2014.

The company said it will hand over the results of the seismic survey to the Congolese government in coming months. It is based on these results that the DRC will decide whether to explore further.

Oil exploration ‘incompatible’ with World Heritage designation

Famous for its mountain gorillas, among the last ones on the planet, Virunga is home to dozens of endangered species, mainly found in and around Lake Edward, the area where Soco has been exploring.

According to the UNESCO convention, the exploration and exploitation of oil is incompatible with the World Heritage Site status. To allow drilling for oil wells legally, the government will have to declassify parts of the park, or Virunga as a whole.

“It would not be a minor modification of the park limits. It would be a major modification that would impair the universal value of the park”, said Leila Maziz, the coordinator for the Congo Basin projects at UNESCO. She added that UNESCO has not received an official request from the Congolese government at this stage.

In its annual report issued last week, Soco stated that it will not be part of the discussions between the UN body and the government. However, prime minister Augustin Matata Ponyo told the BBC that “Soco had brought the issue of the boundary to the government’s attention.”

Under international pressure following a global campaign by WWF and the documentary Virunga, Soco issued a statement that it would not seek to explore further in the park “unless Unesco and the DRC government agree that such activities are not incompatible with its world heritage status.”

Following that statement in June 2014, Soco’s deputy chief executive Roger Cagle told the Times that, nevertheless, DRC could apply for a boundary change.

An ‘alarming’ development

In an official letter seen by the Guardian, Matata Ponyo wrote that his government has been considering boundary change since July 2014, following the UNESCO summit.

“It is alarming that the Congolese prime minister says that Soco has raised the issue of Virunga’s boundary with the government and that the government appears to be moving towards declassifying some of the park”, Dyer said.

A spokeswoman for Soco said: “Soco has publicly stated that it has not and will not lobby the DRC government to redraw the boundaries of the Virunga national park.”

As part of its report, Soco also announced that it has hired the legal firm Clifford Chance to carry out an independent investigation into the allegations brought forward by the documentary ‘Virunga’, as well as Human Rights Watch and Global Witness.

In February, the Church of England threatened to sell its £3m share in Soco, over concerns relating to the company’s behaviour in DRC.

 


 

This article was originally published by the Guardian and is republished here by kind permission via the Guardian Environment Network.

 




391376

DRC Congo wants to develop Virunga’s oil Updated for 2026





The Democratic Republic of Congo’s prime minister has said that his government wants to find a way to explore for oil in the Virunga national park, a UNESCO World Heritage Site, and will engage in negotiations with the UN body to “explore judiciously”.

Virunga, Africa’s oldest and most biodiverse park, has been on the list of ‘World Heritage in danger’ since 1994, as two decades of armed conflict and intense poaching by militias has taken its toll on the park’s ecosystem.

In 2007, the Congolese ministry of hydrocarbons awarded two oil concessions straddling Virunga’s boundaries to the French major Total, as well as Soco International, a British oil company registered on the London Stock Exchange.

While Total quickly agreed to never explore within the current limits of the park – even in the event of a boundaries change – Soco has carried out exploratory activities in Virunga, concluding a seismic study in July 2014.

The company said it will hand over the results of the seismic survey to the Congolese government in coming months. It is based on these results that the DRC will decide whether to explore further.

Oil exploration ‘incompatible’ with World Heritage designation

Famous for its mountain gorillas, among the last ones on the planet, Virunga is home to dozens of endangered species, mainly found in and around Lake Edward, the area where Soco has been exploring.

According to the UNESCO convention, the exploration and exploitation of oil is incompatible with the World Heritage Site status. To allow drilling for oil wells legally, the government will have to declassify parts of the park, or Virunga as a whole.

“It would not be a minor modification of the park limits. It would be a major modification that would impair the universal value of the park”, said Leila Maziz, the coordinator for the Congo Basin projects at UNESCO. She added that UNESCO has not received an official request from the Congolese government at this stage.

In its annual report issued last week, Soco stated that it will not be part of the discussions between the UN body and the government. However, prime minister Augustin Matata Ponyo told the BBC that “Soco had brought the issue of the boundary to the government’s attention.”

Under international pressure following a global campaign by WWF and the documentary Virunga, Soco issued a statement that it would not seek to explore further in the park “unless Unesco and the DRC government agree that such activities are not incompatible with its world heritage status.”

Following that statement in June 2014, Soco’s deputy chief executive Roger Cagle told the Times that, nevertheless, DRC could apply for a boundary change.

An ‘alarming’ development

In an official letter seen by the Guardian, Matata Ponyo wrote that his government has been considering boundary change since July 2014, following the UNESCO summit.

“It is alarming that the Congolese prime minister says that Soco has raised the issue of Virunga’s boundary with the government and that the government appears to be moving towards declassifying some of the park”, Dyer said.

A spokeswoman for Soco said: “Soco has publicly stated that it has not and will not lobby the DRC government to redraw the boundaries of the Virunga national park.”

As part of its report, Soco also announced that it has hired the legal firm Clifford Chance to carry out an independent investigation into the allegations brought forward by the documentary ‘Virunga’, as well as Human Rights Watch and Global Witness.

In February, the Church of England threatened to sell its £3m share in Soco, over concerns relating to the company’s behaviour in DRC.

 


 

This article was originally published by the Guardian and is republished here by kind permission via the Guardian Environment Network.

 




391376

DRC Congo wants to develop Virunga’s oil Updated for 2026





The Democratic Republic of Congo’s prime minister has said that his government wants to find a way to explore for oil in the Virunga national park, a UNESCO World Heritage Site, and will engage in negotiations with the UN body to “explore judiciously”.

Virunga, Africa’s oldest and most biodiverse park, has been on the list of ‘World Heritage in danger’ since 1994, as two decades of armed conflict and intense poaching by militias has taken its toll on the park’s ecosystem.

In 2007, the Congolese ministry of hydrocarbons awarded two oil concessions straddling Virunga’s boundaries to the French major Total, as well as Soco International, a British oil company registered on the London Stock Exchange.

While Total quickly agreed to never explore within the current limits of the park – even in the event of a boundaries change – Soco has carried out exploratory activities in Virunga, concluding a seismic study in July 2014.

The company said it will hand over the results of the seismic survey to the Congolese government in coming months. It is based on these results that the DRC will decide whether to explore further.

Oil exploration ‘incompatible’ with World Heritage designation

Famous for its mountain gorillas, among the last ones on the planet, Virunga is home to dozens of endangered species, mainly found in and around Lake Edward, the area where Soco has been exploring.

According to the UNESCO convention, the exploration and exploitation of oil is incompatible with the World Heritage Site status. To allow drilling for oil wells legally, the government will have to declassify parts of the park, or Virunga as a whole.

“It would not be a minor modification of the park limits. It would be a major modification that would impair the universal value of the park”, said Leila Maziz, the coordinator for the Congo Basin projects at UNESCO. She added that UNESCO has not received an official request from the Congolese government at this stage.

In its annual report issued last week, Soco stated that it will not be part of the discussions between the UN body and the government. However, prime minister Augustin Matata Ponyo told the BBC that “Soco had brought the issue of the boundary to the government’s attention.”

Under international pressure following a global campaign by WWF and the documentary Virunga, Soco issued a statement that it would not seek to explore further in the park “unless Unesco and the DRC government agree that such activities are not incompatible with its world heritage status.”

Following that statement in June 2014, Soco’s deputy chief executive Roger Cagle told the Times that, nevertheless, DRC could apply for a boundary change.

An ‘alarming’ development

In an official letter seen by the Guardian, Matata Ponyo wrote that his government has been considering boundary change since July 2014, following the UNESCO summit.

“It is alarming that the Congolese prime minister says that Soco has raised the issue of Virunga’s boundary with the government and that the government appears to be moving towards declassifying some of the park”, Dyer said.

A spokeswoman for Soco said: “Soco has publicly stated that it has not and will not lobby the DRC government to redraw the boundaries of the Virunga national park.”

As part of its report, Soco also announced that it has hired the legal firm Clifford Chance to carry out an independent investigation into the allegations brought forward by the documentary ‘Virunga’, as well as Human Rights Watch and Global Witness.

In February, the Church of England threatened to sell its £3m share in Soco, over concerns relating to the company’s behaviour in DRC.

 


 

This article was originally published by the Guardian and is republished here by kind permission via the Guardian Environment Network.

 




391376

DRC Congo wants to develop Virunga’s oil Updated for 2026





The Democratic Republic of Congo’s prime minister has said that his government wants to find a way to explore for oil in the Virunga national park, a UNESCO World Heritage Site, and will engage in negotiations with the UN body to “explore judiciously”.

Virunga, Africa’s oldest and most biodiverse park, has been on the list of ‘World Heritage in danger’ since 1994, as two decades of armed conflict and intense poaching by militias has taken its toll on the park’s ecosystem.

In 2007, the Congolese ministry of hydrocarbons awarded two oil concessions straddling Virunga’s boundaries to the French major Total, as well as Soco International, a British oil company registered on the London Stock Exchange.

While Total quickly agreed to never explore within the current limits of the park – even in the event of a boundaries change – Soco has carried out exploratory activities in Virunga, concluding a seismic study in July 2014.

The company said it will hand over the results of the seismic survey to the Congolese government in coming months. It is based on these results that the DRC will decide whether to explore further.

Oil exploration ‘incompatible’ with World Heritage designation

Famous for its mountain gorillas, among the last ones on the planet, Virunga is home to dozens of endangered species, mainly found in and around Lake Edward, the area where Soco has been exploring.

According to the UNESCO convention, the exploration and exploitation of oil is incompatible with the World Heritage Site status. To allow drilling for oil wells legally, the government will have to declassify parts of the park, or Virunga as a whole.

“It would not be a minor modification of the park limits. It would be a major modification that would impair the universal value of the park”, said Leila Maziz, the coordinator for the Congo Basin projects at UNESCO. She added that UNESCO has not received an official request from the Congolese government at this stage.

In its annual report issued last week, Soco stated that it will not be part of the discussions between the UN body and the government. However, prime minister Augustin Matata Ponyo told the BBC that “Soco had brought the issue of the boundary to the government’s attention.”

Under international pressure following a global campaign by WWF and the documentary Virunga, Soco issued a statement that it would not seek to explore further in the park “unless Unesco and the DRC government agree that such activities are not incompatible with its world heritage status.”

Following that statement in June 2014, Soco’s deputy chief executive Roger Cagle told the Times that, nevertheless, DRC could apply for a boundary change.

An ‘alarming’ development

In an official letter seen by the Guardian, Matata Ponyo wrote that his government has been considering boundary change since July 2014, following the UNESCO summit.

“It is alarming that the Congolese prime minister says that Soco has raised the issue of Virunga’s boundary with the government and that the government appears to be moving towards declassifying some of the park”, Dyer said.

A spokeswoman for Soco said: “Soco has publicly stated that it has not and will not lobby the DRC government to redraw the boundaries of the Virunga national park.”

As part of its report, Soco also announced that it has hired the legal firm Clifford Chance to carry out an independent investigation into the allegations brought forward by the documentary ‘Virunga’, as well as Human Rights Watch and Global Witness.

In February, the Church of England threatened to sell its £3m share in Soco, over concerns relating to the company’s behaviour in DRC.

 


 

This article was originally published by the Guardian and is republished here by kind permission via the Guardian Environment Network.

 




391376

Boris progresses ‘Greater London National Park’ Updated for 2026





The office of the London Mayor, Boris Johnson, is to progress moves towards a Greater London National Park.

Daniel Raven-Ellison, who developed the concept and is now campaigning for its fruition, expressed himself “delighted” with the development.

“The Mayor’s office has offered to ‘allocate some officer time’ to support our ‘endeavours’ in developing a proposal for a Greater London National Park”, he announced today. “This is great news and moves our campaign into a new phase.”

Last October Johnson described the concept as “an engaging way of sparking debate” but argued that he did not have the power to create a new class of urban park, so today’s move indicates an important change in thinking – and may indicate his desire to secure a long-term ‘green’ legacy for London.

Green London

Al though London is well known as once of the world’s great cities, it has another side. Of the proposed London Park’s 1,500 square kilometres, home to over 8 million people, 60% of the area consists of green, blue and open spaces.

Over 1,300 Sites of Importance for Nature Conservation cover 19% of the proposed Park area, which is home to more than 1,500 species of flowering plant and 300 species of bird, with four UNESCO World Heritage Sites, one of Britain’s National Trails, and 170 museums.

But the main beneficiaries of the Park’s designation would be London’s people, Raven-Ellison told The Ecologist, by encouraging more people to enjoy and explore London’s wild spaces, and make use of natural corridors for walking, running and enjoyment.

“We have the new wetlands in Walthamstow, or the Colne Valley and Sydenham Woods. But if you were new to London you wouldn’t necessarily visit these places because you’d be unaware of them. National Park City status could change that.”

He emphasises that the initiative would not add significantly to local taxes: “It wouldn’t have to cost a huge amount of money because there are already tens of thousands of people already delivering environmental services. We just need a great team to pull it all together, create new opportunities and unlock London’s potential.”

A hot topic for the 2016 election?

Although the UK has its general election in 2015, London’s next mayoral elections are in 2016, giving plenty more time to build up steam behind the campaign.

Boris is expected to stand down as Mayor in 2016 to give his full-time attention to national politics as an MP, having already been selected as the Tory candidate for the Uxbridge & South Ruislip constituency, a safe Conservative seat.

With the Greater London National Park looking like a strong vote winner, most 2016 Mayoral candidates are likely to back the plan – with the exception of UKIP with its dyed-in-the-wool anti-environment tendencies.

“Those standing for mayor need to recognise that the city could be at the forefront of a green revolution”, says Raven Ellison, who is already canvassing prospective candidates.

“It is a no brainer. The issues are too pressing to ignore. And this is a big vision we can all get behind.”

 


 

Action: Help make it happen!

Petition: Become a Founder of the Greater London National Park.

 




388395

Boris progresses ‘Greater London National Park’ Updated for 2026





The office of the London Mayor, Boris Johnson, is to progress moves towards a Greater London National Park.

Daniel Raven-Ellison, who developed the concept and is now campaigning for its fruition, expressed himself “delighted” with the development.

“The Mayor’s office has offered to ‘allocate some officer time’ to support our ‘endeavours’ in developing a proposal for a Greater London National Park”, he announced today. “This is great news and moves our campaign into a new phase.”

Last October Johnson described the concept as “an engaging way of sparking debate” but argued that he did not have the power to create a new class of urban park, so today’s move indicates an important change in thinking – and may indicate his desire to secure a long-term ‘green’ legacy for London.

Green London

Al though London is well known as once of the world’s great cities, it has another side. Of the proposed London Park’s 1,500 square kilometres, home to over 8 million people, 60% of the area consists of green, blue and open spaces.

Over 1,300 Sites of Importance for Nature Conservation cover 19% of the proposed Park area, which is home to more than 1,500 species of flowering plant and 300 species of bird, with four UNESCO World Heritage Sites, one of Britain’s National Trails, and 170 museums.

But the main beneficiaries of the Park’s designation would be London’s people, Raven-Ellison told The Ecologist, by encouraging more people to enjoy and explore London’s wild spaces, and make use of natural corridors for walking, running and enjoyment.

“We have the new wetlands in Walthamstow, or the Colne Valley and Sydenham Woods. But if you were new to London you wouldn’t necessarily visit these places because you’d be unaware of them. National Park City status could change that.”

He emphasises that the initiative would not add significantly to local taxes: “It wouldn’t have to cost a huge amount of money because there are already tens of thousands of people already delivering environmental services. We just need a great team to pull it all together, create new opportunities and unlock London’s potential.”

A hot topic for the 2016 election?

Although the UK has its general election in 2015, London’s next mayoral elections are in 2016, giving plenty more time to build up steam behind the campaign.

Boris is expected to stand down as Mayor in 2016 to give his full-time attention to national politics as an MP, having already been selected as the Tory candidate for the Uxbridge & South Ruislip constituency, a safe Conservative seat.

With the Greater London National Park looking like a strong vote winner, most 2016 Mayoral candidates are likely to back the plan – with the exception of UKIP with its dyed-in-the-wool anti-environment tendencies.

“Those standing for mayor need to recognise that the city could be at the forefront of a green revolution”, says Raven Ellison, who is already canvassing prospective candidates.

“It is a no brainer. The issues are too pressing to ignore. And this is a big vision we can all get behind.”

 


 

Action: Help make it happen!

Petition: Become a Founder of the Greater London National Park.

 




388395

Boris progresses ‘Greater London National Park’ Updated for 2026





The office of the London Mayor, Boris Johnson, is to progress moves towards a Greater London National Park.

Daniel Raven-Ellison, who developed the concept and is now campaigning for its fruition, expressed himself “delighted” with the development.

“The Mayor’s office has offered to ‘allocate some officer time’ to support our ‘endeavours’ in developing a proposal for a Greater London National Park”, he announced today. “This is great news and moves our campaign into a new phase.”

Last October Johnson described the concept as “an engaging way of sparking debate” but argued that he did not have the power to create a new class of urban park, so today’s move indicates an important change in thinking – and may indicate his desire to secure a long-term ‘green’ legacy for London.

Green London

Al though London is well known as once of the world’s great cities, it has another side. Of the proposed London Park’s 1,500 square kilometres, home to over 8 million people, 60% of the area consists of green, blue and open spaces.

Over 1,300 Sites of Importance for Nature Conservation cover 19% of the proposed Park area, which is home to more than 1,500 species of flowering plant and 300 species of bird, with four UNESCO World Heritage Sites, one of Britain’s National Trails, and 170 museums.

But the main beneficiaries of the Park’s designation would be London’s people, Raven-Ellison told The Ecologist, by encouraging more people to enjoy and explore London’s wild spaces, and make use of natural corridors for walking, running and enjoyment.

“We have the new wetlands in Walthamstow, or the Colne Valley and Sydenham Woods. But if you were new to London you wouldn’t necessarily visit these places because you’d be unaware of them. National Park City status could change that.”

He emphasises that the initiative would not add significantly to local taxes: “It wouldn’t have to cost a huge amount of money because there are already tens of thousands of people already delivering environmental services. We just need a great team to pull it all together, create new opportunities and unlock London’s potential.”

A hot topic for the 2016 election?

Although the UK has its general election in 2015, London’s next mayoral elections are in 2016, giving plenty more time to build up steam behind the campaign.

Boris is expected to stand down as Mayor in 2016 to give his full-time attention to national politics as an MP, having already been selected as the Tory candidate for the Uxbridge & South Ruislip constituency, a safe Conservative seat.

With the Greater London National Park looking like a strong vote winner, most 2016 Mayoral candidates are likely to back the plan – with the exception of UKIP with its dyed-in-the-wool anti-environment tendencies.

“Those standing for mayor need to recognise that the city could be at the forefront of a green revolution”, says Raven Ellison, who is already canvassing prospective candidates.

“It is a no brainer. The issues are too pressing to ignore. And this is a big vision we can all get behind.”

 


 

Action: Help make it happen!

Petition: Become a Founder of the Greater London National Park.

 




388395

Boris progresses ‘Greater London National Park’ Updated for 2026





The office of the London Mayor, Boris Johnson, is to progress moves towards a Greater London National Park.

Daniel Raven-Ellison, who developed the concept and is now campaigning for its fruition, expressed himself “delighted” with the development.

“The Mayor’s office has offered to ‘allocate some officer time’ to support our ‘endeavours’ in developing a proposal for a Greater London National Park”, he announced today. “This is great news and moves our campaign into a new phase.”

Last October Johnson described the concept as “an engaging way of sparking debate” but argued that he did not have the power to create a new class of urban park, so today’s move indicates an important change in thinking – and may indicate his desire to secure a long-term ‘green’ legacy for London.

Green London

Al though London is well known as once of the world’s great cities, it has another side. Of the proposed London Park’s 1,500 square kilometres, home to over 8 million people, 60% of the area consists of green, blue and open spaces.

Over 1,300 Sites of Importance for Nature Conservation cover 19% of the proposed Park area, which is home to more than 1,500 species of flowering plant and 300 species of bird, with four UNESCO World Heritage Sites, one of Britain’s National Trails, and 170 museums.

But the main beneficiaries of the Park’s designation would be London’s people, Raven-Ellison told The Ecologist, by encouraging more people to enjoy and explore London’s wild spaces, and make use of natural corridors for walking, running and enjoyment.

“We have the new wetlands in Walthamstow, or the Colne Valley and Sydenham Woods. But if you were new to London you wouldn’t necessarily visit these places because you’d be unaware of them. National Park City status could change that.”

He emphasises that the initiative would not add significantly to local taxes: “It wouldn’t have to cost a huge amount of money because there are already tens of thousands of people already delivering environmental services. We just need a great team to pull it all together, create new opportunities and unlock London’s potential.”

A hot topic for the 2016 election?

Although the UK has its general election in 2015, London’s next mayoral elections are in 2016, giving plenty more time to build up steam behind the campaign.

Boris is expected to stand down as Mayor in 2016 to give his full-time attention to national politics as an MP, having already been selected as the Tory candidate for the Uxbridge & South Ruislip constituency, a safe Conservative seat.

With the Greater London National Park looking like a strong vote winner, most 2016 Mayoral candidates are likely to back the plan – with the exception of UKIP with its dyed-in-the-wool anti-environment tendencies.

“Those standing for mayor need to recognise that the city could be at the forefront of a green revolution”, says Raven Ellison, who is already canvassing prospective candidates.

“It is a no brainer. The issues are too pressing to ignore. And this is a big vision we can all get behind.”

 


 

Action: Help make it happen!

Petition: Become a Founder of the Greater London National Park.

 




388395

Boris progresses ‘Greater London National Park’ Updated for 2026





The office of the London Mayor, Boris Johnson, is to progress moves towards a Greater London National Park.

Daniel Raven-Ellison, who developed the concept and is now campaigning for its fruition, expressed himself “delighted” with the development.

“The Mayor’s office has offered to ‘allocate some officer time’ to support our ‘endeavours’ in developing a proposal for a Greater London National Park”, he announced today. “This is great news and moves our campaign into a new phase.”

Last October Johnson described the concept as “an engaging way of sparking debate” but argued that he did not have the power to create a new class of urban park, so today’s move indicates an important change in thinking – and may indicate his desire to secure a long-term ‘green’ legacy for London.

Green London

Al though London is well known as once of the world’s great cities, it has another side. Of the proposed London Park’s 1,500 square kilometres, home to over 8 million people, 60% of the area consists of green, blue and open spaces.

Over 1,300 Sites of Importance for Nature Conservation cover 19% of the proposed Park area, which is home to more than 1,500 species of flowering plant and 300 species of bird, with four UNESCO World Heritage Sites, one of Britain’s National Trails, and 170 museums.

But the main beneficiaries of the Park’s designation would be London’s people, Raven-Ellison told The Ecologist, by encouraging more people to enjoy and explore London’s wild spaces, and make use of natural corridors for walking, running and enjoyment.

“We have the new wetlands in Walthamstow, or the Colne Valley and Sydenham Woods. But if you were new to London you wouldn’t necessarily visit these places because you’d be unaware of them. National Park City status could change that.”

He emphasises that the initiative would not add significantly to local taxes: “It wouldn’t have to cost a huge amount of money because there are already tens of thousands of people already delivering environmental services. We just need a great team to pull it all together, create new opportunities and unlock London’s potential.”

A hot topic for the 2016 election?

Although the UK has its general election in 2015, London’s next mayoral elections are in 2016, giving plenty more time to build up steam behind the campaign.

Boris is expected to stand down as Mayor in 2016 to give his full-time attention to national politics as an MP, having already been selected as the Tory candidate for the Uxbridge & South Ruislip constituency, a safe Conservative seat.

With the Greater London National Park looking like a strong vote winner, most 2016 Mayoral candidates are likely to back the plan – with the exception of UKIP with its dyed-in-the-wool anti-environment tendencies.

“Those standing for mayor need to recognise that the city could be at the forefront of a green revolution”, says Raven Ellison, who is already canvassing prospective candidates.

“It is a no brainer. The issues are too pressing to ignore. And this is a big vision we can all get behind.”

 


 

Action: Help make it happen!

Petition: Become a Founder of the Greater London National Park.

 




388395