Tag Archives: today

On trial today – Thailand’s food workers’ rights Updated for 2026





Four criminal and civil prosecutions have been filed against me since 2013 by Natural Fruit Company Ltd, an exporter of tinned and concentrate pineapple and member of NatGroup.

More prosecutions were threatened last week also by the Thai Pineapple Industry Association (TPIA), whose President owns Natural Fruit, after an international solidarity campaign.

The first criminal trial in these cases, together carrying a maximum prison sentence of 8 years and a US$10m damages claim, starts today, 2nd September 2014.

But I am indeed not a criminal. I am just a 34 year old British migrant rights defender and researcher working in Thailand for a decade now. During this time, I simply tried to empower and defend migrant workers, particularly from Myanmar. I feel I can contribute uniquely and effectively on this issue.

In my mind, I have two greatest achievements in my life so far. First is supporting the founding and growth of the Migrant Worker Rights Network (MWRN), a Myanmar worker funded and managed migrant organisation that continues to make me proud and happy.

Second is organising Daw Aung San Suu Kyi’s 2012 visit to Myanmar migrants in Mahachai, Samut Sakhon Province, at the office of MWRN.

Natural Fruit Company determined to punish me

Given my character and area of work in defending and empowering migrant workers, I have disputed with many people. Particularly employers, official, brokers and companies. But beyond some expression of discomfort by those on the receiving end, sometimes of public denunciations when companies or people didn’t respect migrants’ rights and continued to refuse to do so, I never faced many problems.

I began to work more closely with Thai industry, particularly the food industry. I have even acted as a migration advisor for a number of major food export companies since the beginning of 2014.

However, this situation changed after the launch in January 2013 of a Finnwatch report on working conditions in Thai tuna and pineapple processing factories that exported to Finland and other Western countries. It exposed appalling practices including forced and child labour, unlawfully low wages, excessive overtime, abuse by managers and unsafe working conditions.

Although I only researched the report and did not publish it, Natural Fruit Company Ltd – Thailand’s biggest exporter of pineapple products – decided to harass me over the report and its findings. I was an easy target as I live in the region.

It took a while to understand and adjust to the situation I was in. My future life and decisions and movements became restricted by Natural Fruit Company’s private actions.

Once the Attorney General approved the first of 3 criminal charges against me in June 2014, I was detained in a cell prior to being granted bail, actually paid for by the Thai seafood industry – which has committed to working with Finnwatch to improve migrant working conditions.

From then on, my passport was confiscated by the Court as I was a perceived flight risk, even though I returned to Thailand from where I lived in Myanmar just to fight the cases. Now the Thai government and courts formally will decide my fate.

This cloud has a silver lining – for the food workers

My prosecution made me realize however that every perceivably negative situation can be seen in a positive light. The increasingly high profile nature of the judicial harassment against me has proven to be beneficial in contributing to achieving more effectively just those goals of increased rights and access to justice for migrants in Thailand that I have worked hard to achieve for so many years.

My harassment is being used effectively by me, consumer groups, trade unions and rights groups as a means of increasing awareness and interest of consumers and importers of Thai products on the systematic nature of migrant exploitation in Thailand and the link to trade, export and corporate social responsibility. With more awareness surely comes more pressure for positive change and then eventually the change itself.

Already United Nordic, the giant Nordic buyer, has spoken out against the Thai food industries actions in prosecuting me. Now the Ethical Trading Initiative has followed suit, and more support is on the way. Natural Fruit’s actions are impacting negatively on Thailand’s reputation and its economy, not only itself.

At least 10% of Thailand workers are vulnerable migrants

For almost 3 decades, Thailand’s export orientated economy has been dependent on millions of overseas migrants, particularly from Myanmar and Cambodia. These generally impoverished low skilled workers fled from military dictatorships or economic stagnation.

They make up at least 10% of the labour market in Thailand, if not more. Increasingly these vulnerable workers make up the majority of workers in low skilled labour intensive food export and other industries.

Exploitation of migrants by employers, officials and brokers is widespread and systematic in Thailand. Thai migration policy has always been a shambles, devoid of long term planning and the rule of law. Corruption and abuse of power are all encompassing features of the migration system here, every day experiences for the workers themselves.

For this reason, in 2014 Thailand fell to Tier 3 on the US government’s trafficking in persons (TIP) annual report. Migrants are generally silent in the face of abuse and oppression. To stand up and defend their rights, to fight for better conditions, would risk their lives.

Abuse is widespread in export industries

Abuse experienced by migrants in Thailand, often treated as second class citizens or walking ATMs, extends to many export markets. Consumers across the world should be increasingly aware of this. The abuse extends beyond fishing, seafood and pineapples, those products whose abusive supply chains have already been well publicized.

Abuse against migrants is also present in the poultry, fruit, vegetable and rubber industries. Even more now, migrants are working and facing abuse in Thailand’s retail, food and beverage and tourism industry too. This abuse needs publicizing and addressing also.

There are good employers, good companies and good conditions within some labour intensive export industries in Thailand. It’s important to stress this point and promote these ‘good apples’.

But in my experience, these good, ethical and respectable companies are in the minority. Selfish business attitude, appalling treatment of workers, particularly migrants, as machines or commodities to use for personal profit too often trumps respect and rights.

It’s time for change in Thailand, and it’s time for consumers, purchasers and retailers to take a stand against abuse of workers, particularly migrants, that is ongoing. It’s time for Thai industry to face the reality of the situation, address challenges they face, weed out bad guys and promote the good guys.

Our retailers must take a lead – and pay more for ethical produce

Respecting workers rights should also be rewarded and paid for. Lowest priced products can contribute to abuse so we all may have to pay more. Importantly, large retailers or purchasers may need to make less, manufacturers to provide workers more. Workers deserve a share of the profit of their hard work.

Whatever happens in my own personal criminal prosecutions, only time will tell. The past few weeks have shown me however that I am not alone in my campaign to address migrant conditions in Thailand, whatever may happen. Indeed I have never felt alone in the battle either.

Unions, rights groups, consumers and even now purchasers and buyers of Thai products, as well as sectors of Thai industry itself, have come out to support my work and the principles I fight for. I have a strong and committed group of colleagues on the ground here too.

 


 

Andy Hall is an investigator and campaigner on migrant workers’ rights in Thailand, one of the world’s major exporters of tropical fruits and fish to worldwide markets. He blogs at andyjhall.wordpress.com/.

The Finnwatch report: Cheap has a high price.

 

 




383463

On trial today – Thailand’s food workers’ rights Updated for 2026





Four criminal and civil prosecutions have been filed against me since 2013 by Natural Fruit Company Ltd, an exporter of tinned and concentrate pineapple and member of NatGroup.

More prosecutions were threatened last week also by the Thai Pineapple Industry Association (TPIA), whose President owns Natural Fruit, after an international solidarity campaign.

The first criminal trial in these cases, together carrying a maximum prison sentence of 8 years and a US$10m damages claim, starts today, 2nd September 2014.

But I am indeed not a criminal. I am just a 34 year old British migrant rights defender and researcher working in Thailand for a decade now. During this time, I simply tried to empower and defend migrant workers, particularly from Myanmar. I feel I can contribute uniquely and effectively on this issue.

In my mind, I have two greatest achievements in my life so far. First is supporting the founding and growth of the Migrant Worker Rights Network (MWRN), a Myanmar worker funded and managed migrant organisation that continues to make me proud and happy.

Second is organising Daw Aung San Suu Kyi’s 2012 visit to Myanmar migrants in Mahachai, Samut Sakhon Province, at the office of MWRN.

Natural Fruit Company determined to punish me

Given my character and area of work in defending and empowering migrant workers, I have disputed with many people. Particularly employers, official, brokers and companies. But beyond some expression of discomfort by those on the receiving end, sometimes of public denunciations when companies or people didn’t respect migrants’ rights and continued to refuse to do so, I never faced many problems.

I began to work more closely with Thai industry, particularly the food industry. I have even acted as a migration advisor for a number of major food export companies since the beginning of 2014.

However, this situation changed after the launch in January 2013 of a Finnwatch report on working conditions in Thai tuna and pineapple processing factories that exported to Finland and other Western countries. It exposed appalling practices including forced and child labour, unlawfully low wages, excessive overtime, abuse by managers and unsafe working conditions.

Although I only researched the report and did not publish it, Natural Fruit Company Ltd – Thailand’s biggest exporter of pineapple products – decided to harass me over the report and its findings. I was an easy target as I live in the region.

It took a while to understand and adjust to the situation I was in. My future life and decisions and movements became restricted by Natural Fruit Company’s private actions.

Once the Attorney General approved the first of 3 criminal charges against me in June 2014, I was detained in a cell prior to being granted bail, actually paid for by the Thai seafood industry – which has committed to working with Finnwatch to improve migrant working conditions.

From then on, my passport was confiscated by the Court as I was a perceived flight risk, even though I returned to Thailand from where I lived in Myanmar just to fight the cases. Now the Thai government and courts formally will decide my fate.

This cloud has a silver lining – for the food workers

My prosecution made me realize however that every perceivably negative situation can be seen in a positive light. The increasingly high profile nature of the judicial harassment against me has proven to be beneficial in contributing to achieving more effectively just those goals of increased rights and access to justice for migrants in Thailand that I have worked hard to achieve for so many years.

My harassment is being used effectively by me, consumer groups, trade unions and rights groups as a means of increasing awareness and interest of consumers and importers of Thai products on the systematic nature of migrant exploitation in Thailand and the link to trade, export and corporate social responsibility. With more awareness surely comes more pressure for positive change and then eventually the change itself.

Already United Nordic, the giant Nordic buyer, has spoken out against the Thai food industries actions in prosecuting me. Now the Ethical Trading Initiative has followed suit, and more support is on the way. Natural Fruit’s actions are impacting negatively on Thailand’s reputation and its economy, not only itself.

At least 10% of Thailand workers are vulnerable migrants

For almost 3 decades, Thailand’s export orientated economy has been dependent on millions of overseas migrants, particularly from Myanmar and Cambodia. These generally impoverished low skilled workers fled from military dictatorships or economic stagnation.

They make up at least 10% of the labour market in Thailand, if not more. Increasingly these vulnerable workers make up the majority of workers in low skilled labour intensive food export and other industries.

Exploitation of migrants by employers, officials and brokers is widespread and systematic in Thailand. Thai migration policy has always been a shambles, devoid of long term planning and the rule of law. Corruption and abuse of power are all encompassing features of the migration system here, every day experiences for the workers themselves.

For this reason, in 2014 Thailand fell to Tier 3 on the US government’s trafficking in persons (TIP) annual report. Migrants are generally silent in the face of abuse and oppression. To stand up and defend their rights, to fight for better conditions, would risk their lives.

Abuse is widespread in export industries

Abuse experienced by migrants in Thailand, often treated as second class citizens or walking ATMs, extends to many export markets. Consumers across the world should be increasingly aware of this. The abuse extends beyond fishing, seafood and pineapples, those products whose abusive supply chains have already been well publicized.

Abuse against migrants is also present in the poultry, fruit, vegetable and rubber industries. Even more now, migrants are working and facing abuse in Thailand’s retail, food and beverage and tourism industry too. This abuse needs publicizing and addressing also.

There are good employers, good companies and good conditions within some labour intensive export industries in Thailand. It’s important to stress this point and promote these ‘good apples’.

But in my experience, these good, ethical and respectable companies are in the minority. Selfish business attitude, appalling treatment of workers, particularly migrants, as machines or commodities to use for personal profit too often trumps respect and rights.

It’s time for change in Thailand, and it’s time for consumers, purchasers and retailers to take a stand against abuse of workers, particularly migrants, that is ongoing. It’s time for Thai industry to face the reality of the situation, address challenges they face, weed out bad guys and promote the good guys.

Our retailers must take a lead – and pay more for ethical produce

Respecting workers rights should also be rewarded and paid for. Lowest priced products can contribute to abuse so we all may have to pay more. Importantly, large retailers or purchasers may need to make less, manufacturers to provide workers more. Workers deserve a share of the profit of their hard work.

Whatever happens in my own personal criminal prosecutions, only time will tell. The past few weeks have shown me however that I am not alone in my campaign to address migrant conditions in Thailand, whatever may happen. Indeed I have never felt alone in the battle either.

Unions, rights groups, consumers and even now purchasers and buyers of Thai products, as well as sectors of Thai industry itself, have come out to support my work and the principles I fight for. I have a strong and committed group of colleagues on the ground here too.

 


 

Andy Hall is an investigator and campaigner on migrant workers’ rights in Thailand, one of the world’s major exporters of tropical fruits and fish to worldwide markets. He blogs at andyjhall.wordpress.com/.

The Finnwatch report: Cheap has a high price.

 

 




383463

The nuclear industry today: declining, but not (yet) dying Updated for 2026





Every year, the World Nuclear Industry Status Report reminds me why those in the Green movement who think nuclear has a major role to play in securing a low-carbon world are completely, dangerously off their collective trollies.

The Status Report is not an anti-nuclear polemic. Over the years, its authors (Mycle Schneider and Antony Froggatt) have assiduously built its reputation for dispassionate reporting on the state of the industry, presented as objectively and non-judgmentally as possible.

It uses a wide range of sources (academic, industry, avowedly pro-nuclear and avowedly anti-nuclear) to maintain longitudinal datasets going back over decades to tell it as it is – in contrast to all the froth of partisan propaganda. On both sides.

Let me just give you a taste from the newly-published 2014 Report:

Overview

“The nuclear share of the world’s power generation declined steadily from an historic peak of 17.6% in 1996 to 10.8% in 2013. Nuclear power’s share of global commercial primary energy production declined from the 2012 low of 4.5%, a level last seen in 1984, to a new low of 4.4%.”

“Twenty-eight years after the Chernobyl disaster, none of the next generation reactors (or so-called Generation III or III+) has entered service, with construction projects in Finland and France many years behind schedule.”

Construction

“As of July 2014, 67 reactors were under construction (one more than in July 2013), with a total capacity of 64GW. The average building time of the units under construction stands at seven years. However:

  • At least 49 of the 67 reactors have encountered construction delays, most of them significant (several months to several years). For the first time, major delays – several months to over two years – have been admitted on three-quarters (21 out of 28) of the projects in China.
  • Eight reactors have been listed as ‘under construction’ for more than 20 years, another for 12 years.
  • Two-thirds (43) of the units under construction are located in three countries: China, India and Russia.”


Certification delays

“The certification of new reactor designs encounters continuous obstacles. In the US, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) first delayed to 2015 the certification of the Franco-German-designed EP, and no longer projects any completion date for the review.

“The NRC rejected the licence application for the South Korean APR 1400 due to lack of information in key areas. Only the Westinghouse AP 1000 has received full generic design approval in the US.

“There is no projected completion date for the renewal of certification for the two versions of the ABWR (GE-Hitachi and Toshiba).”

Operating cost increases

“In some countries (including France, Germany, the US and Sweden), historically low inflation-adjusted operating costs – especially for major repairs – have escalated so rapidly that the average reactor’s operating cost is barely below, or even exceeds, the normal band of wholesale power prices.”

The Report is particularly strong on comparing the differences between nuclear power and renewable energy deployment.

“Compared to 1997, when the Kyoto Protocol on Climate Change was signed, there has been an additional 616 TWh per year of windpower produced, and 124 TWh of solar photovoltaics, outpacing nuclear with just 114 TWh.

In 2013, growth rates for generation from wind power above 20% were seen in North America, Europe and Eurasia, and Asia Pacific, with the two largest markets in the US (19%) and China (38%).

In the world of photovoltaics, North America saw a more than doubling of power generation, Asia Pacific a 75% increase.”

Installed capacity

“Globally, since 2000, the annual growth rates for wind power have averaged 25%, and for solar voltaics 43%. This has resulted, in 2013 alone, in 32 GW of wind and 37 GW of solar being added. Nuclear generating capacity declined by 19 GW compared to the 2000 level.”

China

“By the end of 2013, China had a total of 91 GW of operating windpower capacity. China’s 18 GW of installed solar capacity for the first time exceeded operating nuclear capacity.

China added a new world record of at least 12 GW of solar in just one year (versus 3 GW of nuclear), overtaking Germany’s previous 7.6 GW record and exceeding cumulative US additions since it invented photovoltaics in the 1950s.

“China now aims at 40 GW of solar, and will probably exceed the 100 GW wind power target for 2015.”

Nuclear’s installed capacity at the level of decades ago

Not surprisingly, this is the Report’s principal conclusion:

“The nuclear industry is in decline: the 388 operating reactors are 50 fewer than the peak in 2002, while the total installed capacity peaked in 2010 at 367 GW before declining to the current level, which is comparable to levels last seen two decades ago. Annual nuclear electricity generation reached a maximum of 2,660 TW hours in 2006, and dropped to 2,359 TW hours in 2013.”

This is all just the top line. The Report digs down deep into the situation in Japan (as troubling as ever, whatever the self-justifying protestations of George Monbiot – the man who, mystifyingly, ‘fell in love’ with nuclear power because of Fukushima – and others), in China, at Hinkley Point, and in the context of a whole range of “potential newcomer countries”.

As I worked my way through all this, page by page, it’s all but impossible for me to understand how any thoughtful, intelligent environmentalist could possibly suppose either that

  • a so-called nuclear renaissance is ever going to happen; or
  • even in the improbable circumstances that it did, how it could possibly deliver the kind of safe, secure, low-carbon energy the world needs so desperately.

And the longer they hang on to these fantasies, the more damage they do, sowing confusion and doubt, distracting attention from the business of driving forward with the renewables-efficiency-storage alternative.

All I can think is that these people never actually read up on the state of play in the nuclear industry. They should try it: it’s illuminating.

 


 

Jonathon Porritt has been an environmental campaigner since 1974, and is still hard at it nearly 40 years on. His latest book is The World we Made. He blogs at jonathonporritt.com/blog

Read the World Nuclear Report.

 

 




383087