Tag Archives: factory

Big stink! 24,500-pig factory farm defeated Updated for 2026





The Environment Agency has turned down a permit application by Midland Pig Producers for a 24,500 pig ‘mega-farm’ because the operation would risk human health and the rights of residents to breathe clean air free of heavy agricultural odours.

According to the Agency, “The reason for refusal is that based on the information that has been provided to us we cannot be satisfied that the activities can be undertaken without resulting in significant pollution of the environment due to odour which will result in offence to human senses and impair amenity and/or legitimate uses of the environment.”

“We do not have confidence in the Applicant’s control measures to prevent an unacceptable risk of odour pollution beyond the installation boundary”, the decision notice continued. “We cannot give the Applicant any comfort that in this location any proposals would reduce the risk of odour pollution to an acceptable level.”

On health impacts, the Agency stated that “we cannot yet conclude that the risks from bioaerosols emitted from site are low”, and “we cannot yet conclude that the risks from ammonia emissions on human health from site are not significant.” It also found that the plans to dispose of excess water were “unclear” and could pose a risk to a local stream, Dale Brook.

Residents welcome decision

The proposed unit at Foston, Derbyshire, has been the subject of fierce opposition in a four-year-long fight that saw celebrities – including actor Dominic West and River Cottage chef Hugh Fearnley-Whittingstall – stand up against the proposed farm due to its monstrous scale.

The Ministry of Justice, which runs the women’s prison at Foston less than 150 metres from the proposed site, also sent in a list of objections.

Jim Davies, leader of the Foston Community Action Group, said local residents, who had been almost unanimous in opposing the plan, were hugely relieved: “After four years of public consultation the facts are now clear; the applicants provided insufficient information and should now abandon this flawed scheme forever.”

Sue Weston, whose house is next door to the proposed site, said she was “over the moon” at the decision. “This industrial development would totally ruin the small village community of Foston and put innocent families in danger from the unknown consequences of an experimental pig prison.”

But the story may not be over yet. A spokesperson for Midland Pig Producers told the BBC: “While not wishing to second-guess any decision by any other body, it seems inevitable that this outcome will provide others with the reason to refuse any application connected with our plans. However, now that we have an actual decision, we can move forward. This is not the end of the matter, but the beginning of the second stage.”

The wider problem

There is mounting public anxiety that industrial, intensive pig rearing systems cause stress and illness in animals and threaten human health. The regular over-use of anitbiotics in such ‘factory’ farm systems is producing antibiotic-resistant superbugs. The farms also pollute the air and water.

“These factory systems are cruel to pigs”, said Tracy Worcester, Director of Farms Not Factories, which campaigns for consumers to buy their pork from real farms. “They are also a threat to traditional family farmers who, though costing less in terms of human health and environmental pollution, incur more expense when rearing their pigs humanely and therefore cannot compete economically with cheap, low-welfare pork.”

“Consumers need to look for UK high welfare labels like Freedom Food and Organic”, she added. “To cover the extra cost we can buy less popular cuts, shop online or at a local farmers’ market. We urge consumers to take our Pig Pledge and pay a fair price for high welfare pork to avoid animal factories such as Foston.”

Responding to the company’s statement about moving to “the second stage”, Worcester insisted: “It’s time for Midland Pig Producers to withdraw their planning application and give local people back their peace of mind.”

Not a moment too soon!

Her view is heartily endorsed by the Soil Association, which in 2010 received legal threats from the company insisting that it withdraw its formal complaints to the planning authority about the proposed farm.

Soil Association policy director Peter Melchett said: “This is a great victory for the local residents, who remained resolute in their determination to defeat this proposal, which posed a serious health risk to the village of Foston and the nearby Foston Women’s Prison.

“What is most significant is the signal this sends to the British farming industry about the future of livestock farming in this country. We are not, as is often claimed, on a relentless and unstoppable drive to have bigger and more intensive livestock systems.

“The Soil Association’s Not in My Banger campaign, launched nearly five years ago to oppose the Foston pig farm, calls for all pigs to have the right to live part of their lives in the open air, not to be subject to mutilation and for sows to be able to make a nest in which to give birth. The Environment Agency’s decision vindicates the Soil Association’s long campaign.

“We are confident that the planning application can now be swiftly dismissed by Derbyshire County Council, bringing an end to this unhappy saga.”

 


 

Action: Buy only high welfare pork (or go meat-free). Look for supermarket labels ‘Freedom Food’, ‘outdoor bred’, ‘free range’ or ‘organic’. Sign the Pig Pledge and get your local high welfare producers to sign up to our High Welfare Directory.

 




390800

Coca-Cola forced out of $25 million factory in India Updated for 2026





The Coca-Cola company has been forced to abandon a $25 million newly built bottling plant in Mehdiganj, Varanasi, India as the result of a sustained campaign against the company’s plans.

The $25 million plant – which was a significant expansion to its existing plant in Mehdiganj – had already been fully built and the company had also conducted trial runs, but could not operate commercially as it did not have the required permits to operate.

Coca-Cola required permissions, or ‘No Objection Certificate’ (NOC), from the Central Ground Water Authority (CGWA) – the national groundwater regulatory agency, and the Uttar Pradesh Pollution Control Board (UPPCB) – the statewide pollution regulatory agency.

The Central Ground Water Authority rejected Coca-Cola’s application to operate for its new facility on July 21, 2014, and had sought time till 25th August 2014, to announce its decision before the National Green Tribunal (NGT), India’s ‘green’ court.

Coke ‘withdraws’ days before the announcement

Somehow having learnt that its application had been rejected, in order to save itself major embarrassment, Coca-Cola sent a letter to the CGWA on Friday, August 22, 2014 – two days before the rejection was to be made public on Monday, August 25, 2014 – stating that it was “withdrawing” its application.

Bizarrely, Coca-Cola blamed “inordinate delays” by the authority as the reason for its “withdrawal” just two days before the decision was to be made public.

The campaign has worked for the last two years to ensure that the regulators were made aware of the problems being created by Coca-Cola’s existing bottling facility, and the reasons why a five-fold increase in groundwater allowance that Coca-Cola had sought for its new facility would further deteriorate the conditions in the area.

The Uttar Pradesh Pollution Control Board (UPPCB) had also shut down Coca-Cola’s plant on June 6, 2014 because it found the company to be violating a number of conditions of its license, including a lack of NOC from the Central Ground Water Authority (CGWA).

Coca-Cola was able to obtain a stay order from the NGT that allowed it to temporarily re-open its existing plant on June 20, 2014

Groundwater shortages followed Coke’s arrival

The groundwater conditions in the Mehdiganj area have gone from ‘safe’ category, when Coca-Cola began operations in June 1999 to ‘critical’ in 2009.

As a result, severe restrictions have been placed by the government on groundwater use by the community and farmers.

“Coca-Cola is a shameless and unethical company that has consistently placed its pursuit of profits over the well-being of communities that live around its facilities”, said Amit Srivastava of the India Resource Center which has led the campaign to challenge the new plant.

“It is absolutely reprehensible for a globally recognized company like Coca-Cola to seek further groundwater allowances from an area that has become acutely water-stressed, and that in large part due to its own mining of groundwater.”

A ‘major setback’

The loss of the $25 million project is a major setback for Coca-Cola. The company has identified India as a major market where it seeks to derive significant future profits, particularly since Coca-Cola sales are being hit in more developed due to major health concerns.

“We are delighted that the Indian government is doing what it is supposed to do – protect the common property resource of groundwater from rampant exploitation, particularly in water-stressed areas.

“This should serve as a notice to other companies that they cannot run roughshod over Indian rules and regulations and deny community rights over groundwater”, said Srivastava.

 


 

More information: www.IndiaResource.org.

Also on The Ecologist:

 




383176