Tag Archives: goes

Call goes out for dolphinarium-free Europe Updated for 2026





The ‘Dolphinaria-Free Europe Coalition‘ (DFEC), consisting of 19 NGOs from 11 countries, are calling upon European citizens, Parliamentarians and Member State governments to end captive dolphin shows and interactive sessions which, they say, “exploit the animals and compromise their welfare.”

There are currently 33 dolphinaria in 15 EU countries, collectively holding an estimated 307 captive whales and dolphins. The Coalition’s first objective is to raise awareness about their exploitation.

“In our view, the scientific evidence is conclusive”, says DFEC’s Policy Coordinator Daniel Turner, also Programmes Manager for the Born Free Foundation, who is asking supporters to ‘Make a promise for freedom‘.

The keeping of whales and dolphins in captivity, where they are trained to perform unnatural behaviours, not only distorts the natural attributes of these highly intelligent, social animals, but is also known to compromise the animal’s physical and mental health.”

The UK’s Green MEP Keith Taylor, a co-hosts of the launch, added: “To confine creatures such as whales, dolphins and porpoise which are used to roaming large territories to live in small pools – all in the name of public entertainment – is cruel.

“Denying these intelligent animals’ sufficient space and complexity causes them to develop abnormal behaviour and heightened aggression as, for example, shown in the film ‘Blackfish’. This is why I want to see an end to cetacean captivity.

The law is failing to prevent serious abuses

In the EU dolphinaria are regulated by national zoo laws in the State where they are located and by the EU’s 1999/22 Zoos Directive, which requires all dolphinaria to make demonstrable commitments to species conservation, public education and higher standards of animal welfare.

But a recent report by ENDCAP found widespread abuses taking place. Its main findings were:

  • “Dolphinaria in the EU are failing to comply” with the Zoos Directive
  • The dolphinaria are making an “insignificant contribution to the conservation of biodiversity.”
  • 285 live cetaceans have been imported into the EU between 1979 and 2008, violating a prohibition under EU CITES Regulation 338/97 on imports of cetaceans into the EU for primarily commercial purposes.
  • Public education in most surveyed dolphinaria was “poor”.
  • All dolphinaria in the EU display their cetaceans to the paying public in regular presentations or shows, often to loud music, in which the animals perform tricks and stunts.
  • 19 dolphinaria allow visitors to get close to cetaceans, including for the taking of photographs, in swimming with dolphins programmes or in Dolphin Assisted Therapy programmes – placing both parties “at significant risk of disease and injury.”
  • No captive cetacean in the EU has the freedom to express normal behaviour, a guiding principle for animal welfare. “Stress and stereotypic behaviour are common among captive cetaceans.”
  • Dolphinaria in the EU fail to meet the biological requirements of cetaceans in captivity and to provide species-specific enrichment – is a key requirement of the Zoos Directive.

Italian MEP Marco Affronte, also a co-host of today’s event, commented: “There is really no excuse – if dolphinaria cannot adequately provide whales and dolphins with their physical and behaviour needs, there is no longer a place for these attractions in the European Union. Emphasis must be given to the protection of these animals in the wild, not their incarceration in captivity.”

Welfare concerns grow over poor conditioons

According to DFEC, the largest captive facilities are a fraction of the size of the natural home ranges of whales, dolphins and porpoises. For example, orcas may travel 150 kilometres in a day, but the largest orca tank in the world is 70 metres long

Captive dolphins sharing a pool are often unrelated, from different geographic regions or from different species, which can result in dominance-related aggression, injuries, illness and death. In the wild, most cetaceans live in family groups of 100 or more animals.

Loud music and the regular, repetitive noise of pumps and filters are thought to cause significant stress to captive cetaceans, who are highly dependent on their sense of hearing. Tranquillizers including Diazepam (Valium) are widely used by the captive dolphin industry.

Captive facilities lack stimulation, and some (in Belgium, Lithuania, Bulgaria) only provide indoor facilities, without natural light and with possibly insufficient air circulation. Most pools are smooth-sided.

And far from promoting cetacean conservation, dolphinaria endanger wild animals. “Low breeding success has rendered the captive dolphin population not self-sustaining”, DFEC reports, necessitating the capture of wild cetaceans which “continues to be a threat to small, local populations.”

Spain (11) and Italy (4) host the majority of facilities. Species include bottlenose dolphins (an estimated 281 individuals), orca (12 individuals), harbour porpoise (estimated 11 individuals), beluga whales (two individuals) and one Amazon River dolphin (September 2014).

Thirteen Member States do not host dolphinaria. Slovenia, Cyprus and Croatia prohibit the keeping of cetaceans in captivity for commercial purposes, Hungary prohibits dolphin imports, whilst Greece has banned all animal performances.

Five Member States (Belgium, Finland, Italy, Poland and the United Kingdom) have specific legislative standards for the keeping of cetaceans in captivity. The UK’s high standards currently preclude maintaining dolphinaria in the country. Italy has some of the best standards, but these are rarely enforced.

 


 

Pledge:Make a promise for freedom‘.

Campaign: Dolphinaria-Free Europe.

 

 




390965

2014 badger cull failed – but the cull goes on Updated for 2026





The Government today has released the results of the 2014 badger culls in Gloucestershire and Somerset.

In West Gloucestershire the cull was an outright failure. To be consider ‘effective’, the cull needed to kill at least 615 badgers, and no more than 1091. In fact, just 274 were killed – less than half of the minimum figure.

Defra today blamed the failure on the “challenges of extensive unlawful protest and intimidation” in Gloucestershire – an admission that may only encourage badger groups opposing the cull.

In West Somerset the cull killed 341 badgers – just within the specified range of 316 – 785.

But in fact, badger expert Professor Rosie Woodroffe has  dismissed the targets as having been in effect fixed at dangerously low levels to make them easier to meet. 

“The targets are all rubbish because they are based on rubbish data. In Somerset they set themselves an unbelievably easy target”, she told the Guardian in October. “It was not set in line with their aim – to kill at least 70% of badgers. They have completely thrown that out.”

Spread of bovine TB could actually be increased

The danger is that if too few badgers are killed, populations are disrupted causing increased badger movements, and more spreading of bovine TB among badgers and cattle. To prevent that the aim is to kill 70% of the population.

The badger population was estimated by counting the number of setts in the area, then multiplying it by the estimated number of badgers per sett. In Somerset, that led to a minimum cull number between 316 and 1,776 badgers – of which Defra chose the lowest possible figure.

It’s therefore highly likely that the 341 badgers killed in the Somerset cull is well under the 70% threshold for effectiveness and will serve only to disrupt badger society and increase the spread of bovine TB.

“In a clear attempt to bury bad news over Christmas, the report paints a picture of a disastrous policy which has clearly failed on scientific, economic and humaneness grounds”, said Dominic Dyer, chief executive of the Badger Trust.

Gloucestershire cull should not continue unless more effective

Nigel Gibbens, chief veterinary officer at Defra, said: “Given the level of badger population reduction estimated in the Somerset cull area in 2014, the benefits of reducing the disease in cattle over the planned four-year cull can be expected to be realised there.”

However he issued a stark warning over the Cloucestershire cull: “Given the lower level of badger population reduction in the Gloucestershire cull area over the past two years, the benefits of reducing the disease in cattle may not be realised there.”

And he added that culling should continue in Gloucestershire in 2015 only if there are “reasonable grounds for confidence that it can be carried out more effectively”.

He also conceded that there was “room for disagreement” over the humaneness of the culling, with some badgers surviving in agony for five minutes after being shot.

Environment secretary Liz Truss insisted: “The chief vet’s advice is that the results of this year’s cull in Somerset show they can be effective. That is why I am determined to continue with a comprehensive strategy that includes culling.”

Bring an end to this cruel policy!

But Dyer disagrees: “Despite spending millions of pounds of tax payers money the DEFRA Chief Veterinary Officer admits for the first time today that the badger cull is failing. It’s now time for the Government to admit it has got it wrong and bring an end to this disastrous cruel policy once and for all.

“It should now follow the example of Wales and introduce annual TB testing for cattle combined with tighter bio security and cattle control movements, with compliance linked to CAP single payments for farmers.

“This policy has delivered a 48% drop in the number of cattle slaughtered for TB in Wales in the last 5 years without killing any badgers at all.”

 


 

Oliver Tickell edits The Ecologist.

 

 




382026