Tag Archives: sustainable

Ecopel’s Journey to Bio-Based Faux Fur: A Sustainable Fashion Revolution

Ecopel’s Commitment to Sustainability

Ecopel, a leader in the production of faux fur, is taking a significant step towards sustainability by transitioning to bio-based materials. This move is not just a trend; it reflects a deeper understanding of environmental responsibilities and a commitment to reducing the ecological footprint of the fashion industry.

The Science Behind Bio-Based Faux Fur

At the core of this transition lies the use of sophorolipids, a type of glycolipid compound synthesized by selected non-pathogenic yeast species. These compounds have been identified as potential bio-surfactants due to their remarkable biodegradability and low eco-toxicity. Unlike traditional faux fur, which often relies on petroleum-based materials, bio-based faux fur utilizes these naturally derived substances to create a sustainable alternative that maintains the luxurious feel and aesthetic appeal of real fur.

Understanding Sophorolipids

Sophorolipids are fascinating compounds with unique surface-active properties. They can be produced through a fermentation process, where yeast metabolizes sugars to yield these glycolipids. The result is a biodegradable material that not only minimizes environmental impact but also offers a viable solution to the pressing issues of waste management and pollution associated with synthetic fibers.

The Benefits of Bio-Based Faux Fur

The transition to bio-based faux fur presents numerous benefits, both environmentally and socially. Here are some key advantages:

1. Environmental Impact

Traditional faux fur production often contributes to pollution and environmental degradation. In contrast, bio-based faux fur significantly reduces the carbon footprint associated with its manufacturing. The use of renewable resources and biodegradable materials means that, at the end of its lifecycle, the product will not contribute to landfill overflow or microplastic pollution.

2. Ethical Considerations

Consumers are increasingly aware of the ethical implications of their purchasing decisions. By opting for bio-based faux fur, they are choosing a product that does not rely on animal cruelty or exploitation. This aligns with the values of a growing demographic that prioritizes humane and ethical practices in fashion.

3. Performance and Aesthetics

One common misconception about bio-based materials is that they compromise on quality. However, advancements in textile technology have ensured that bio-based faux fur can match, if not exceed, the aesthetic and performance qualities of its synthetic counterparts. This means that consumers can enjoy luxurious, soft, and durable faux fur without the negative environmental impact.

The Road Ahead for Ecopel

Ecopel’s transition towards bio-based faux fur is a testament to its dedication to innovation and sustainability in the fashion industry. As the company continues to explore and refine its production processes, it is also likely to invest in research and development to expand its range of bio-based materials.

Collaboration with Industry Partners

To enhance its efforts, Ecopel may seek collaborations with researchers and other organizations focused on sustainable materials. By pooling resources and knowledge, these partnerships can accelerate the development of new eco-friendly textiles that could revolutionize the industry.

Consumer Education

Another critical aspect of this transition is consumer education. Ecopel must communicate the benefits of bio-based faux fur effectively, helping consumers understand why this shift is essential. Transparency about sourcing, production methods, and environmental impact will foster trust and encourage more people to make sustainable fashion choices.

Conclusion: A Sustainable Future for Fashion

Ecopel’s move towards bio-based faux fur is a significant step in redefining the fashion landscape. As the demand for eco-friendly products continues to grow, companies that embrace sustainability will not only thrive but also lead the charge towards a more responsible and ethical fashion industry. Through innovation, collaboration, and education, Ecopel is setting a precedent for others to follow, proving that style and sustainability can coexist harmoniously.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

Why is Ecopel embarks on its transition towards bio-based faux fur – FashionNetwork gaining popularity?

In practical terms, it mainly concerns Ecopel embarks on its transition towards bio-based faux fur  FashionNetwork – The World's Fashion Business News. Understanding this aspect is the first step to mastering Ecopel embarks on its transition towards bio-based faux fur – FashionNetwork.

What exactly does Ecopel embarks on its transition towards bio-based faux fur – FashionNetwork mean?

The greatest impact is observed when we consider that glycolipid compound that can be synthesized by a selected number of non-pathogenic yeast species. As. This explains much of the current interest.

What is the real impact of Ecopel embarks on its transition towards bio-based faux fur – FashionNetwork today?

A key element to consider is that potential bio-surfactants due to their biodegradability and low eco-toxicity.. Many experts agree on this point when analyzing Ecopel embarks on its transition towards bio-based faux fur – FashionNetwork.

How does Ecopel embarks on its transition towards bio-based faux fur – FashionNetwork work in practice?

To study it properly, it is essential to start from real data and observe how trends are evolving in the reference market of Ecopel embarks on its transition towards bio-based faux fur – FashionNetwork.

AI Generated: CarbonZero.Eco opens first commercial biochar plant in California

CarbonZero.Eco Launches First Commercial Biochar Plant in California: A Step Towards Sustainable Energy

Introduction to Biochar and Its Importance

Biochar, a carbon-rich material produced from organic waste through pyrolysis, is gaining traction as a sustainable solution for both waste management and energy production. The recent opening of CarbonZero.Eco’s first commercial biochar plant in California marks a significant milestone in the biochar industry, combining waste-to-energy processes with eco-friendly practices.

AI Generated: CarbonZero.Eco opens first commercial biochar plant in California
AI Generated: CarbonZero.Eco opens first commercial biochar plant in California — Fonte: Wikimedia Commons

The Role of Waste-to-Energy in Sustainable Practices

Waste-to-energy (WtE) processes are designed to transform waste materials into usable forms of energy, primarily electricity or heat. These plants contribute to sustainable energy production by mitigating landfill waste and offering an alternative energy source. The significance of WtE lies not just in energy recovery but also in its ability to support effective waste management strategies.

CarbonZero.Eco’s Biochar Plant: A Game Changer

CarbonZero.Eco’s new facility in California is poised to revolutionize the biochar landscape. This plant will utilize organic waste, such as agricultural residues, forestry by-products, and even municipal solid waste, to produce biochar. By converting waste into a valuable resource, CarbonZero.Eco is addressing two pressing challenges: waste management and the need for sustainable energy solutions.

How the Biochar Process Works

The process begins with the collection of organic waste, which is then subjected to pyrolysis – a thermal decomposition process that occurs in the absence of oxygen. This process not only produces biochar but also generates syngas and bio-oil, which can be harnessed for energy. The biochar itself can be used in various applications, including soil amendment, carbon sequestration, and even as a filtration medium.

Benefits of Biochar Production

The advantages of producing biochar through CarbonZero.Eco’s plant extend beyond waste reduction. Here are some key benefits:

1. Carbon Sequestration

Biochar is known for its ability to sequester carbon, effectively removing it from the atmosphere. By converting organic waste into biochar, CarbonZero.Eco is contributing to climate change mitigation and promoting a circular economy.

2. Soil Health Improvement

Addition of biochar to soil enhances its structure, increases moisture retention, and improves nutrient availability. This not only boosts agricultural productivity but also promotes sustainable farming practices.

3. Reduction of Landfill Waste

The biochar plant directly tackles the issue of waste management by diverting organic materials from landfills. This reduces methane emissions – a potent greenhouse gas produced during the decomposition of organic waste.

4. Renewable Energy Production

Through the gasification process in biochar production, CarbonZero.Eco can produce renewable energy in the form of syngas and bio-oil. This contributes to California’s renewable energy goals and reduces reliance on fossil fuels.

Challenges and Opportunities in the Biochar Industry

Despite its benefits, the biochar industry faces challenges that need to be addressed for broader adoption. Some of these include:

1. Initial Investment and Technology Costs

Establishing biochar production facilities requires significant investment in technology and infrastructure. However, as the industry matures, costs are expected to decrease, making it more accessible for new entrants.

2. Public Awareness and Acceptance

Educating the public about the benefits of biochar and its role in sustainable practices is crucial. Increased awareness can drive demand for biochar products in agriculture and other sectors.

Conclusion: A Sustainable Future with Biochar

CarbonZero.Eco’s launch of its first commercial biochar plant in California is a pivotal step toward sustainable waste management and energy production. By harnessing the potential of biochar, we can address climate change, improve soil health, and promote renewable energy sources. The success of this facility could inspire similar initiatives globally, paving the way for a more sustainable future.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

What is the real impact of CarbonZero.Eco opens first commercial biochar plant in California today?

In practical terms, it mainly concerns CarbonZero.Eco opens first commercial biochar plant in California  World Bio Market Insights Waste-to-energy (WtE) or energy-from-waste. Understanding this aspect is the first step to mastering CarbonZero.Eco opens first commercial biochar plant in California.

How does CarbonZero.Eco opens first commercial biochar plant in California work in practice?

The greatest impact is observed when we consider that to convert waste materials into usable forms of energy, typically electricity or heat, in waste-to-energy. This explains much of the current interest.

What are the benefits related to CarbonZero.Eco opens first commercial biochar plant in California?

A key element to consider is that note how as a form of energy recovery, WtE plays a crucial role in both. Many experts agree on this point when analyzing CarbonZero.Eco opens first commercial biochar plant in California.

Who should be interested in CarbonZero.Eco opens first commercial biochar plant in California?

To study it properly, it is essential to start from real data and observe how trends are evolving in the reference market of CarbonZero.Eco opens first commercial biochar plant in California.

Illegal Swedish fishery is ‘certified sustainable’ Updated for 2026





Last week a lobster fishery in the Kattegat, the area of sea between northern Denmark and Sweden, is the proud recipient of a ‘sustainable fishing’ certificate through the Marine Stewardship Council (MSC).

But only four months ago Citizen Inspectors of The Black Fish (TBF) – an Amsterdam-based environmental group dedicated to preventing illegal overfishing in European seas – observed fishermen illegally targetting protected cod stocks in the exact same fishery – and has the photographic and video evidence to prove it.

But the MSC has decided to disregard the evidence of illegal activity, prompting Wietse van der Werf, TBF’s International Director, to comment:

“Sustainability labels mean very little if certifiers are not digging deeper to find out what is really happening in fisheries. Surprise inspections and undercover investigators would be a good start.”

The evidence collected by TBF’s Citizen Inspectors will not be made public, pending its use in possible legal action, adds van der Werf: “We will continue to build on our findings as with more evidence we stand a stronger case.”

Good lobster, bad cod

The ‘sustainable’ fishery targets Norwegian lobster (also known as nephrops) with trawlers. But the Kattegat also contains important spawning areas for cod, which has been heavily overfished in the area over recent decades.

So the area contains two fisheries: a sustainable lobster fishery, and a very unsustainable cod fishery. Complicating the picture, Kattegat trawlers often catch the lobster and cod together in the same net, continuing the negative impacts on the troubled fish.

To protect the cod, while allowing the lobster fishery to continue, the Swedish authorities imposed new rules requiring fishers to fit specially designed grids in their trawl nets that create openings that adult cod caught up in the net can escape through, while retaining the lobsters.

But as one as of TBF’s Citizens Inspectors explains: “During the inspections we found multiple steel grids which weren’t properly attached to the trawl nets, allowing for an opening to be created underneath the grid, so cod could be caught.

“One net even used chains as weights to open up the net further, making the fitted grid totally useless. On another occasion we observed fishers re-attaching their nets upon return to the port, presumably for the net to meet the requirements during a possible inspection by fisheries officials.”

But the lobster will continue to carry the MSC label

In spite of the evidence of illegal ‘black’ cod fishing in the Kategat, products from the nephrops fishery will now bear the Marine Stewardship Council (MSC) label for ‘sustainable fisheries’.

TBF notified the MSC about its findings but learned that the formal assessment period for the fisheries had already passed, so it was too late for their evidence to be taken into account.

Annual surveillance audits are carried out by the certification body but according to van der Werf, “we fear that these will yield little result in uncovering illegal activities, in part because they are publicly announced before they take place.”

By contrast, TBF’s Citizen Inspector Network carried out over 100 inspections in Swedish fishing ports last August, identifying numerous trawl nets illegally modified to prevent the cod’s escape.

 


 

Help: The Black Fish appeals to anyone who might have further information about illegal activities in the Swedish nephrop fishery to come forward. Our legal team can be contacted at legal@theblackfish.org.

Source: The Black Fish.

The Black Fish is an international organisation that works to end illegal overfishing. Our approach brings together people and the benefits of modern technology to protect the oceans through enforcement of environmental regulations. The Black Fish currently runs 28 projects in 12 countries around Europe, with an international team of 30 staff, countless volunteers and supporters around the world.

 




389954

Illegal Swedish fishery is ‘certified sustainable’ Updated for 2026





Last week a lobster fishery in the Kattegat, the area of sea between northern Denmark and Sweden, is the proud recipient of a ‘sustainable fishing’ certificate through the Marine Stewardship Council (MSC).

But only four months ago Citizen Inspectors of The Black Fish (TBF) – an Amsterdam-based environmental group dedicated to preventing illegal overfishing in European seas – observed fishermen illegally targetting protected cod stocks in the exact same fishery – and has the photographic and video evidence to prove it.

But the MSC has decided to disregard the evidence of illegal activity, prompting Wietse van der Werf, TBF’s International Director, to comment:

“Sustainability labels mean very little if certifiers are not digging deeper to find out what is really happening in fisheries. Surprise inspections and undercover investigators would be a good start.”

The evidence collected by TBF’s Citizen Inspectors will not be made public, pending its use in possible legal action, adds van der Werf: “We will continue to build on our findings as with more evidence we stand a stronger case.”

Good lobster, bad cod

The ‘sustainable’ fishery targets Norwegian lobster (also known as nephrops) with trawlers. But the Kattegat also contains important spawning areas for cod, which has been heavily overfished in the area over recent decades.

So the area contains two fisheries: a sustainable lobster fishery, and a very unsustainable cod fishery. Complicating the picture, Kattegat trawlers often catch the lobster and cod together in the same net, continuing the negative impacts on the troubled fish.

To protect the cod, while allowing the lobster fishery to continue, the Swedish authorities imposed new rules requiring fishers to fit specially designed grids in their trawl nets that create openings that adult cod caught up in the net can escape through, while retaining the lobsters.

But as one as of TBF’s Citizens Inspectors explains: “During the inspections we found multiple steel grids which weren’t properly attached to the trawl nets, allowing for an opening to be created underneath the grid, so cod could be caught.

“One net even used chains as weights to open up the net further, making the fitted grid totally useless. On another occasion we observed fishers re-attaching their nets upon return to the port, presumably for the net to meet the requirements during a possible inspection by fisheries officials.”

But the lobster will continue to carry the MSC label

In spite of the evidence of illegal ‘black’ cod fishing in the Kategat, products from the nephrops fishery will now bear the Marine Stewardship Council (MSC) label for ‘sustainable fisheries’.

TBF notified the MSC about its findings but learned that the formal assessment period for the fisheries had already passed, so it was too late for their evidence to be taken into account.

Annual surveillance audits are carried out by the certification body but according to van der Werf, “we fear that these will yield little result in uncovering illegal activities, in part because they are publicly announced before they take place.”

By contrast, TBF’s Citizen Inspector Network carried out over 100 inspections in Swedish fishing ports last August, identifying numerous trawl nets illegally modified to prevent the cod’s escape.

 


 

Help: The Black Fish appeals to anyone who might have further information about illegal activities in the Swedish nephrop fishery to come forward. Our legal team can be contacted at legal@theblackfish.org.

Source: The Black Fish.

The Black Fish is an international organisation that works to end illegal overfishing. Our approach brings together people and the benefits of modern technology to protect the oceans through enforcement of environmental regulations. The Black Fish currently runs 28 projects in 12 countries around Europe, with an international team of 30 staff, countless volunteers and supporters around the world.

 




389954

Illegal Swedish fishery is ‘certified sustainable’ Updated for 2026





Last week a lobster fishery in the Kattegat, the area of sea between northern Denmark and Sweden, is the proud recipient of a ‘sustainable fishing’ certificate through the Marine Stewardship Council (MSC).

But only four months ago Citizen Inspectors of The Black Fish (TBF) – an Amsterdam-based environmental group dedicated to preventing illegal overfishing in European seas – observed fishermen illegally targetting protected cod stocks in the exact same fishery – and has the photographic and video evidence to prove it.

But the MSC has decided to disregard the evidence of illegal activity, prompting Wietse van der Werf, TBF’s International Director, to comment:

“Sustainability labels mean very little if certifiers are not digging deeper to find out what is really happening in fisheries. Surprise inspections and undercover investigators would be a good start.”

The evidence collected by TBF’s Citizen Inspectors will not be made public, pending its use in possible legal action, adds van der Werf: “We will continue to build on our findings as with more evidence we stand a stronger case.”

Good lobster, bad cod

The ‘sustainable’ fishery targets Norwegian lobster (also known as nephrops) with trawlers. But the Kattegat also contains important spawning areas for cod, which has been heavily overfished in the area over recent decades.

So the area contains two fisheries: a sustainable lobster fishery, and a very unsustainable cod fishery. Complicating the picture, Kattegat trawlers often catch the lobster and cod together in the same net, continuing the negative impacts on the troubled fish.

To protect the cod, while allowing the lobster fishery to continue, the Swedish authorities imposed new rules requiring fishers to fit specially designed grids in their trawl nets that create openings that adult cod caught up in the net can escape through, while retaining the lobsters.

But as one as of TBF’s Citizens Inspectors explains: “During the inspections we found multiple steel grids which weren’t properly attached to the trawl nets, allowing for an opening to be created underneath the grid, so cod could be caught.

“One net even used chains as weights to open up the net further, making the fitted grid totally useless. On another occasion we observed fishers re-attaching their nets upon return to the port, presumably for the net to meet the requirements during a possible inspection by fisheries officials.”

But the lobster will continue to carry the MSC label

In spite of the evidence of illegal ‘black’ cod fishing in the Kategat, products from the nephrops fishery will now bear the Marine Stewardship Council (MSC) label for ‘sustainable fisheries’.

TBF notified the MSC about its findings but learned that the formal assessment period for the fisheries had already passed, so it was too late for their evidence to be taken into account.

Annual surveillance audits are carried out by the certification body but according to van der Werf, “we fear that these will yield little result in uncovering illegal activities, in part because they are publicly announced before they take place.”

By contrast, TBF’s Citizen Inspector Network carried out over 100 inspections in Swedish fishing ports last August, identifying numerous trawl nets illegally modified to prevent the cod’s escape.

 


 

Help: The Black Fish appeals to anyone who might have further information about illegal activities in the Swedish nephrop fishery to come forward. Our legal team can be contacted at legal@theblackfish.org.

Source: The Black Fish.

The Black Fish is an international organisation that works to end illegal overfishing. Our approach brings together people and the benefits of modern technology to protect the oceans through enforcement of environmental regulations. The Black Fish currently runs 28 projects in 12 countries around Europe, with an international team of 30 staff, countless volunteers and supporters around the world.

 




389954

Illegal Swedish fishery is ‘certified sustainable’ Updated for 2026





Last week a lobster fishery in the Kattegat, the area of sea between northern Denmark and Sweden, is the proud recipient of a ‘sustainable fishing’ certificate through the Marine Stewardship Council (MSC).

But only four months ago Citizen Inspectors of The Black Fish (TBF) – an Amsterdam-based environmental group dedicated to preventing illegal overfishing in European seas – observed fishermen illegally targetting protected cod stocks in the exact same fishery – and has the photographic and video evidence to prove it.

But the MSC has decided to disregard the evidence of illegal activity, prompting Wietse van der Werf, TBF’s International Director, to comment:

“Sustainability labels mean very little if certifiers are not digging deeper to find out what is really happening in fisheries. Surprise inspections and undercover investigators would be a good start.”

The evidence collected by TBF’s Citizen Inspectors will not be made public, pending its use in possible legal action, adds van der Werf: “We will continue to build on our findings as with more evidence we stand a stronger case.”

Good lobster, bad cod

The ‘sustainable’ fishery targets Norwegian lobster (also known as nephrops) with trawlers. But the Kattegat also contains important spawning areas for cod, which has been heavily overfished in the area over recent decades.

So the area contains two fisheries: a sustainable lobster fishery, and a very unsustainable cod fishery. Complicating the picture, Kattegat trawlers often catch the lobster and cod together in the same net, continuing the negative impacts on the troubled fish.

To protect the cod, while allowing the lobster fishery to continue, the Swedish authorities imposed new rules requiring fishers to fit specially designed grids in their trawl nets that create openings that adult cod caught up in the net can escape through, while retaining the lobsters.

But as one as of TBF’s Citizens Inspectors explains: “During the inspections we found multiple steel grids which weren’t properly attached to the trawl nets, allowing for an opening to be created underneath the grid, so cod could be caught.

“One net even used chains as weights to open up the net further, making the fitted grid totally useless. On another occasion we observed fishers re-attaching their nets upon return to the port, presumably for the net to meet the requirements during a possible inspection by fisheries officials.”

But the lobster will continue to carry the MSC label

In spite of the evidence of illegal ‘black’ cod fishing in the Kategat, products from the nephrops fishery will now bear the Marine Stewardship Council (MSC) label for ‘sustainable fisheries’.

TBF notified the MSC about its findings but learned that the formal assessment period for the fisheries had already passed, so it was too late for their evidence to be taken into account.

Annual surveillance audits are carried out by the certification body but according to van der Werf, “we fear that these will yield little result in uncovering illegal activities, in part because they are publicly announced before they take place.”

By contrast, TBF’s Citizen Inspector Network carried out over 100 inspections in Swedish fishing ports last August, identifying numerous trawl nets illegally modified to prevent the cod’s escape.

 


 

Help: The Black Fish appeals to anyone who might have further information about illegal activities in the Swedish nephrop fishery to come forward. Our legal team can be contacted at legal@theblackfish.org.

Source: The Black Fish.

The Black Fish is an international organisation that works to end illegal overfishing. Our approach brings together people and the benefits of modern technology to protect the oceans through enforcement of environmental regulations. The Black Fish currently runs 28 projects in 12 countries around Europe, with an international team of 30 staff, countless volunteers and supporters around the world.

 




389954

Illegal Swedish fishery is ‘certified sustainable’ Updated for 2026





Last week a lobster fishery in the Kattegat, the area of sea between northern Denmark and Sweden, is the proud recipient of a ‘sustainable fishing’ certificate through the Marine Stewardship Council (MSC).

But only four months ago Citizen Inspectors of The Black Fish (TBF) – an Amsterdam-based environmental group dedicated to preventing illegal overfishing in European seas – observed fishermen illegally targetting protected cod stocks in the exact same fishery – and has the photographic and video evidence to prove it.

But the MSC has decided to disregard the evidence of illegal activity, prompting Wietse van der Werf, TBF’s International Director, to comment:

“Sustainability labels mean very little if certifiers are not digging deeper to find out what is really happening in fisheries. Surprise inspections and undercover investigators would be a good start.”

The evidence collected by TBF’s Citizen Inspectors will not be made public, pending its use in possible legal action, adds van der Werf: “We will continue to build on our findings as with more evidence we stand a stronger case.”

Good lobster, bad cod

The ‘sustainable’ fishery targets Norwegian lobster (also known as nephrops) with trawlers. But the Kattegat also contains important spawning areas for cod, which has been heavily overfished in the area over recent decades.

So the area contains two fisheries: a sustainable lobster fishery, and a very unsustainable cod fishery. Complicating the picture, Kattegat trawlers often catch the lobster and cod together in the same net, continuing the negative impacts on the troubled fish.

To protect the cod, while allowing the lobster fishery to continue, the Swedish authorities imposed new rules requiring fishers to fit specially designed grids in their trawl nets that create openings that adult cod caught up in the net can escape through, while retaining the lobsters.

But as one as of TBF’s Citizens Inspectors explains: “During the inspections we found multiple steel grids which weren’t properly attached to the trawl nets, allowing for an opening to be created underneath the grid, so cod could be caught.

“One net even used chains as weights to open up the net further, making the fitted grid totally useless. On another occasion we observed fishers re-attaching their nets upon return to the port, presumably for the net to meet the requirements during a possible inspection by fisheries officials.”

But the lobster will continue to carry the MSC label

In spite of the evidence of illegal ‘black’ cod fishing in the Kategat, products from the nephrops fishery will now bear the Marine Stewardship Council (MSC) label for ‘sustainable fisheries’.

TBF notified the MSC about its findings but learned that the formal assessment period for the fisheries had already passed, so it was too late for their evidence to be taken into account.

Annual surveillance audits are carried out by the certification body but according to van der Werf, “we fear that these will yield little result in uncovering illegal activities, in part because they are publicly announced before they take place.”

By contrast, TBF’s Citizen Inspector Network carried out over 100 inspections in Swedish fishing ports last August, identifying numerous trawl nets illegally modified to prevent the cod’s escape.

 


 

Help: The Black Fish appeals to anyone who might have further information about illegal activities in the Swedish nephrop fishery to come forward. Our legal team can be contacted at legal@theblackfish.org.

Source: The Black Fish.

The Black Fish is an international organisation that works to end illegal overfishing. Our approach brings together people and the benefits of modern technology to protect the oceans through enforcement of environmental regulations. The Black Fish currently runs 28 projects in 12 countries around Europe, with an international team of 30 staff, countless volunteers and supporters around the world.

 




389954

Illegal Swedish fishery is ‘certified sustainable’ Updated for 2026





Last week a lobster fishery in the Kattegat, the area of sea between northern Denmark and Sweden, is the proud recipient of a ‘sustainable fishing’ certificate through the Marine Stewardship Council (MSC).

But only four months ago Citizen Inspectors of The Black Fish (TBF) – an Amsterdam-based environmental group dedicated to preventing illegal overfishing in European seas – observed fishermen illegally targetting protected cod stocks in the exact same fishery – and has the photographic and video evidence to prove it.

But the MSC has decided to disregard the evidence of illegal activity, prompting Wietse van der Werf, TBF’s International Director, to comment:

“Sustainability labels mean very little if certifiers are not digging deeper to find out what is really happening in fisheries. Surprise inspections and undercover investigators would be a good start.”

The evidence collected by TBF’s Citizen Inspectors will not be made public, pending its use in possible legal action, adds van der Werf: “We will continue to build on our findings as with more evidence we stand a stronger case.”

Good lobster, bad cod

The ‘sustainable’ fishery targets Norwegian lobster (also known as nephrops) with trawlers. But the Kattegat also contains important spawning areas for cod, which has been heavily overfished in the area over recent decades.

So the area contains two fisheries: a sustainable lobster fishery, and a very unsustainable cod fishery. Complicating the picture, Kattegat trawlers often catch the lobster and cod together in the same net, continuing the negative impacts on the troubled fish.

To protect the cod, while allowing the lobster fishery to continue, the Swedish authorities imposed new rules requiring fishers to fit specially designed grids in their trawl nets that create openings that adult cod caught up in the net can escape through, while retaining the lobsters.

But as one as of TBF’s Citizens Inspectors explains: “During the inspections we found multiple steel grids which weren’t properly attached to the trawl nets, allowing for an opening to be created underneath the grid, so cod could be caught.

“One net even used chains as weights to open up the net further, making the fitted grid totally useless. On another occasion we observed fishers re-attaching their nets upon return to the port, presumably for the net to meet the requirements during a possible inspection by fisheries officials.”

But the lobster will continue to carry the MSC label

In spite of the evidence of illegal ‘black’ cod fishing in the Kategat, products from the nephrops fishery will now bear the Marine Stewardship Council (MSC) label for ‘sustainable fisheries’.

TBF notified the MSC about its findings but learned that the formal assessment period for the fisheries had already passed, so it was too late for their evidence to be taken into account.

Annual surveillance audits are carried out by the certification body but according to van der Werf, “we fear that these will yield little result in uncovering illegal activities, in part because they are publicly announced before they take place.”

By contrast, TBF’s Citizen Inspector Network carried out over 100 inspections in Swedish fishing ports last August, identifying numerous trawl nets illegally modified to prevent the cod’s escape.

 


 

Help: The Black Fish appeals to anyone who might have further information about illegal activities in the Swedish nephrop fishery to come forward. Our legal team can be contacted at legal@theblackfish.org.

Source: The Black Fish.

The Black Fish is an international organisation that works to end illegal overfishing. Our approach brings together people and the benefits of modern technology to protect the oceans through enforcement of environmental regulations. The Black Fish currently runs 28 projects in 12 countries around Europe, with an international team of 30 staff, countless volunteers and supporters around the world.

 




389954

Illegal Swedish fishery is ‘certified sustainable’ Updated for 2026





Last week a lobster fishery in the Kattegat, the area of sea between northern Denmark and Sweden, is the proud recipient of a ‘sustainable fishing’ certificate through the Marine Stewardship Council (MSC).

But only four months ago Citizen Inspectors of The Black Fish (TBF) – an Amsterdam-based environmental group dedicated to preventing illegal overfishing in European seas – observed fishermen illegally targetting protected cod stocks in the exact same fishery – and has the photographic and video evidence to prove it.

But the MSC has decided to disregard the evidence of illegal activity, prompting Wietse van der Werf, TBF’s International Director, to comment:

“Sustainability labels mean very little if certifiers are not digging deeper to find out what is really happening in fisheries. Surprise inspections and undercover investigators would be a good start.”

The evidence collected by TBF’s Citizen Inspectors will not be made public, pending its use in possible legal action, adds van der Werf: “We will continue to build on our findings as with more evidence we stand a stronger case.”

Good lobster, bad cod

The ‘sustainable’ fishery targets Norwegian lobster (also known as nephrops) with trawlers. But the Kattegat also contains important spawning areas for cod, which has been heavily overfished in the area over recent decades.

So the area contains two fisheries: a sustainable lobster fishery, and a very unsustainable cod fishery. Complicating the picture, Kattegat trawlers often catch the lobster and cod together in the same net, continuing the negative impacts on the troubled fish.

To protect the cod, while allowing the lobster fishery to continue, the Swedish authorities imposed new rules requiring fishers to fit specially designed grids in their trawl nets that create openings that adult cod caught up in the net can escape through, while retaining the lobsters.

But as one as of TBF’s Citizens Inspectors explains: “During the inspections we found multiple steel grids which weren’t properly attached to the trawl nets, allowing for an opening to be created underneath the grid, so cod could be caught.

“One net even used chains as weights to open up the net further, making the fitted grid totally useless. On another occasion we observed fishers re-attaching their nets upon return to the port, presumably for the net to meet the requirements during a possible inspection by fisheries officials.”

But the lobster will continue to carry the MSC label

In spite of the evidence of illegal ‘black’ cod fishing in the Kategat, products from the nephrops fishery will now bear the Marine Stewardship Council (MSC) label for ‘sustainable fisheries’.

TBF notified the MSC about its findings but learned that the formal assessment period for the fisheries had already passed, so it was too late for their evidence to be taken into account.

Annual surveillance audits are carried out by the certification body but according to van der Werf, “we fear that these will yield little result in uncovering illegal activities, in part because they are publicly announced before they take place.”

By contrast, TBF’s Citizen Inspector Network carried out over 100 inspections in Swedish fishing ports last August, identifying numerous trawl nets illegally modified to prevent the cod’s escape.

 


 

Help: The Black Fish appeals to anyone who might have further information about illegal activities in the Swedish nephrop fishery to come forward. Our legal team can be contacted at legal@theblackfish.org.

Source: The Black Fish.

The Black Fish is an international organisation that works to end illegal overfishing. Our approach brings together people and the benefits of modern technology to protect the oceans through enforcement of environmental regulations. The Black Fish currently runs 28 projects in 12 countries around Europe, with an international team of 30 staff, countless volunteers and supporters around the world.

 




389954

Illegal Swedish fishery is ‘certified sustainable’ Updated for 2026





Last week a lobster fishery in the Kattegat, the area of sea between northern Denmark and Sweden, is the proud recipient of a ‘sustainable fishing’ certificate through the Marine Stewardship Council (MSC).

But only four months ago Citizen Inspectors of The Black Fish (TBF) – an Amsterdam-based environmental group dedicated to preventing illegal overfishing in European seas – observed fishermen illegally targetting protected cod stocks in the exact same fishery – and has the photographic and video evidence to prove it.

But the MSC has decided to disregard the evidence of illegal activity, prompting Wietse van der Werf, TBF’s International Director, to comment:

“Sustainability labels mean very little if certifiers are not digging deeper to find out what is really happening in fisheries. Surprise inspections and undercover investigators would be a good start.”

The evidence collected by TBF’s Citizen Inspectors will not be made public, pending its use in possible legal action, adds van der Werf: “We will continue to build on our findings as with more evidence we stand a stronger case.”

Good lobster, bad cod

The ‘sustainable’ fishery targets Norwegian lobster (also known as nephrops) with trawlers. But the Kattegat also contains important spawning areas for cod, which has been heavily overfished in the area over recent decades.

So the area contains two fisheries: a sustainable lobster fishery, and a very unsustainable cod fishery. Complicating the picture, Kattegat trawlers often catch the lobster and cod together in the same net, continuing the negative impacts on the troubled fish.

To protect the cod, while allowing the lobster fishery to continue, the Swedish authorities imposed new rules requiring fishers to fit specially designed grids in their trawl nets that create openings that adult cod caught up in the net can escape through, while retaining the lobsters.

But as one as of TBF’s Citizens Inspectors explains: “During the inspections we found multiple steel grids which weren’t properly attached to the trawl nets, allowing for an opening to be created underneath the grid, so cod could be caught.

“One net even used chains as weights to open up the net further, making the fitted grid totally useless. On another occasion we observed fishers re-attaching their nets upon return to the port, presumably for the net to meet the requirements during a possible inspection by fisheries officials.”

But the lobster will continue to carry the MSC label

In spite of the evidence of illegal ‘black’ cod fishing in the Kategat, products from the nephrops fishery will now bear the Marine Stewardship Council (MSC) label for ‘sustainable fisheries’.

TBF notified the MSC about its findings but learned that the formal assessment period for the fisheries had already passed, so it was too late for their evidence to be taken into account.

Annual surveillance audits are carried out by the certification body but according to van der Werf, “we fear that these will yield little result in uncovering illegal activities, in part because they are publicly announced before they take place.”

By contrast, TBF’s Citizen Inspector Network carried out over 100 inspections in Swedish fishing ports last August, identifying numerous trawl nets illegally modified to prevent the cod’s escape.

 


 

Help: The Black Fish appeals to anyone who might have further information about illegal activities in the Swedish nephrop fishery to come forward. Our legal team can be contacted at legal@theblackfish.org.

Source: The Black Fish.

The Black Fish is an international organisation that works to end illegal overfishing. Our approach brings together people and the benefits of modern technology to protect the oceans through enforcement of environmental regulations. The Black Fish currently runs 28 projects in 12 countries around Europe, with an international team of 30 staff, countless volunteers and supporters around the world.

 




389954